David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Foundations of Physics 35 (3):417-447 (2005)
Bohr’s interpretation of quantum mechanics has been criticized as incoherent and opportunistic, and based on doubtful philosophical premises. If so Bohr’s influence, in the pre-war period of 1927–1939, is the harder to explain, and the acceptance of his approach to quantum mechanics over de Broglie’s had no reasonable foundation. But Bohr’s interpretation changed little from the time of its first appearance, and stood independent of any philosophical presuppositions. The principle of complementarity is itself best read as a conjecture of unusually wide scope, on the nature and future course of explanations in the sciences (and not only the physical sciences). If it must be judged a failure today, it is not because of any internal inconsistency
|Keywords||Complementarity Scientific rationality|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
James T. Cushing (1994). Quantum Mechanics: Historical Contingency and the Copenhagen Hegemony. University of Chicago Press.
Mara Beller (1999). Quantum Dialogue: The Making of a Revolution. University of Chicago Press.
Dugald Murdoch (1987). Niels Bohr's Philosophy of Physics. Cambridge University Press.
Don Howard (1994). Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
E. Scheibe (1974). The Logical Analysis of Quantum Mechanics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (4):352-358.
Citations of this work BETA
Manuel Bächtold (2008). Are All Measurement Outcomes “Classical”? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 39 (3):620-633.
Manuel Bächtold (2008). Are All Measurement Outcomes “Classical”? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 39 (3):620-633.
Similar books and articles
Michael Cuffaro (2010). The Kantian Framework of Complementarity. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 41 (4):309-317.
Slobodan Perovic (2006). Schrödinger's Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and the Relevance of Bohr's Experimental Critique. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 37 (2):275-297.
Klaus Meyer-Abich (2004). Bohr's Complementarity and Goldstein's Holism in Reflective Pragmatism. Mind and Matter 2 (2):91-103.
Matthew J. Brown (2014). Quantum Frames. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 45 (1):1-10.
S. Müller‐Markus (1966). Niels Bohr in the Darkness and Light of Soviet Philosophy∗. Inquiry 9 (1-4):73-93.
M. S. (1966). Niels Bohr in the Darkness and Light of Soviet Philosophy. Inquiry 9 (1-4):73 – 93.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads35 ( #135,918 of 1,902,889 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #192,369 of 1,902,889 )
How can I increase my downloads?