Graduate studies at Western
Philosophia 40 (2):403-409 (2012)
|Abstract||I formulate and defend two sceptical theses on specific parts of our modal knowledge (unqualified and absolute modalities). My main point is that unqualified modal sentences are defective in that they fail to belong unambiguously to specific modal kinds and thus cannot be evaluated; hence, we must be sceptical of beliefs involving them|
|Keywords||Modal scepticism Absolute modality Modal kinds|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
John Mccarthy (1997). Modality, Si! Modal Logic, No! Studia Logica 59 (1):29-32.
Andrea Sauchelli (2013). Modal Fictionalism, Possible Worlds, and Artificiality. Acta Analytica 28 (4):411-21.
Stephen K. McLeod (2009). Rationalism and Modal Knowledge. Crítica 41 (122):29-42.
Derek Ball (2011). Property Identities and Modal Arguments. Philosophers' Imprint 11 (13).
Andrea Sauchelli (2010). Concrete Possible Worlds and Counterfactual Conditionals: Lewis Versus Williamson on Modal Knowledge. Synthese 176 (3):345-359.
C. Peacocke (1997). Metaphysical Necessity: Understanding, Truth and Epistemology. Mind 106 (423):521-574.
Phillip Bricker (2001). Island Universes and the Analysis of Modality. In G. Preyer & F. Siebelt (eds.), Reality and Humean Supervenience: Essays on the Philosophy of David Lewis. Rowman and Littlefield.
Anand Vaidya (2008). Modal Rationalism and Modal Monism. Erkenntnis 68 (2):191 - 212.
Brian Leftow (2012). God and Necessity. Oxford University Press.
Casey O'Callaghan (2008). Seeing What You Hear: Cross-Modal Illusions and Perception. Philosophical Issues 18 (1):316-338.
Danilo Suster (1996). Modality and Supervenience. Acta Analytica 15 (15):141-155.
Added to index2011-10-28
Total downloads30 ( #46,485 of 739,180 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 739,180 )
How can I increase my downloads?