Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy 83 (3):359-372 (2008)
|Abstract||Lotteries have long been used to resolve competing claims, yet their recent implementation to allocate school places in Brighton and Hove, England led to considerable public outcry. This article argues that, given appropriate selection is impossible when parties have equal claims, a lottery is preferable to an auction because it excludes unjust influences. Three forms of contractualism are discussed and the fairness of lotteries is traced to the fact that they give each person an equal chance, as a surrogate for their equal claim to the good. It is argued that this can be a reason to favour an artificially-constructed lottery to a 'natural' lottery where there is suspicion that the latter may be biased|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ben Saunders (2010). Fairness Between Competing Claims. Res Publica 16 (1):41-55.
Verna V. Gehring (1999). The American State Lottery. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 13 (2):223-238.
Barbara Goodwin (1992). Justice by Lottery. University of Chicago Press.
B. Saunders (2012). Combining Lotteries and Voting. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 11 (4):347-351.
Harry Brighouse (2007). Equality of Opportunity and Complex Equality: The Special Place of Schooling. [REVIEW] Res Publica 13 (2):147-158.
Eugene Mills (2012). Lotteries, Quasi-Lotteries, and Scepticism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (2):335 - 352.
Sopher & Narramore (2000). Stochastic Choice and Consistency in Decision Making Under Risk: An Experimental Study. Theory and Decision 48 (4):323-349.
Ben Saunders (2009). A Defence of Weighted Lotteries in Life Saving Cases. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (3):279 - 290.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads39 ( #34,780 of 739,344 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,186 of 739,344 )
How can I increase my downloads?