David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 71 (3):239-246 (2013)
The merited response argument is an argument in favor of artistic ethicism. According to this view, the interaction between art and morality is such that a moral defect in a work of art negatively influences the work's artistic value (and a moral merit, when relevant, is always an artistic merit). I contend that the argument relies on a criterion of aesthetic and artistic relevance that, when properly understood, fails to constitute a premise that either the artistic contextualist or the autonomist would accept. I then offer a version of the merited response argument that supports artistic contextualism and argue that, given certain controversial assumptions, immoral art in the Western tradition is more common than typically acknowledged in the recent literature on the topic
|Keywords||Art and Ethics Artistic Value Categories of Art|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Andrea Sauchelli (forthcoming). Gendler on the Puzzle of Imaginative Resistance. Acta Analytica:1-9.
Similar books and articles
Berys Nigel Gaut (2007). Art, Emotion and Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Andrew Huddleston (2012). In Defense of Artistic Value. Philosophical Quarterly 62 (249):705-714.
Andrea Sauchelli (2012). Ethicism and Immoral Cognitivism: Gaut Versus Kieran on Art and Morality. Journal of Aesthetic Education 46 (3):107-118.
Kathleen Stock (2005). On Davies' Argument From Relational Properties. Acta Analytica 20 (4):24-31.
Paul Crowther (2007). Defining Art, Creating the Canon: Artistic Value in an Era of Doubt. Oxford University Press.
James Shelley (2002). The Character and Role of Principles in the Evaluation of Art. British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (1):37-51.
Dominic McIver Lopes (2011). The Myth of (Non-Aesthetic) Artistic Value. Philosophical Quarterly 61 (244):518-536.
Jonathan Gilmore (2011). A Functional View of Artistic Evaluation. Philosophical Studies 155 (2):289-305.
Cain Todd (2007). Aesthetic, Ethical, and Cognitive Value. South African Journal of Philosophy 26 (2):216-227.
Henry John Pratt (2012). Artistic Institutions, Valuable Experiences: Coming to Terms with Artistic Value. Philosophia 40 (3):591-606.
Roman Dykast (2009). Otakar Zich: Aesthetic and Artistic Evaluation, Part 1. Estetika 46 (2):179-201.
Roman Dykast (2010). Otakar Zich: Aesthetic and Artistic Evaluation, Parts 2 & 3. Estetika 47 (1):71-95.
Christopher Bartel (2010). The 'Fine Art' of Pornography? In Dave Monroe (ed.), Porn: Philosophy for Everyone. Wiley-Blackwell 153--65.
Robert Stecker (2008). Immoralism and the Anti-Theoretical View. British Journal of Aesthetics 48 (2):145-161.
Rob van Gerwen (2004). Ethical Autonomism. The Work of Art as a Moral Agent. Contemporary Aesthetics 2.
Added to index2013-08-07
Total downloads19 ( #147,771 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #183,615 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?