David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (4):363-377 (2011)
Most legal analyses of selective nontreatment of seriously ill children centre on the question of whether it is in a child’s best interests to be kept alive in the face of extreme suffering and/or an intolerable quality of life. Courts have resisted any direct confrontation with the question of whether the child’s death is in his or her best interests. Nevertheless, representations of death may have an important role to play in this field of jurisprudence. The prevailing philosophy is to configure death as a release from a futile or painful existence and/or as a dignified end in an objectively hopeless situation. However, there can be disagreement about the meaning of death in these settings. Some parents object that death would be premature or that it represents a culpable neglect of their child. A closer examination of these discordant interpretations allows for a better comprehension of the cultural understandings that underscore clinical and legal accounts of death following end-of-life decisions
|Keywords||Death and dying Treatment-limitation in children Parental opposition Good death Legal responsibility for death Personhood and disability|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Adrienne Asch (1998). Distracted by Disability. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (01):77-87.
Patrick D. Hopkins (1997). Why Does Removing Machines Count as “Passive” Euthanasia? Hastings Center Report 27 (3):29-37.
Eva Feder Kittay (2005). At the Margins of Moral Personhood. Ethics 116 (1):100-131.
H. E. McHaffie (2001). Deciding for Imperilled Newborns: Medical Authority or Parental Autonomy? Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (2):104-109.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Shelly Kagan (2012). Death. Yale University Press.
Michael Ashby (2011). The Futility of Futility: Death Causation is the 'Elephant in the Room' in Discussions About Limitation of Medical Treatment. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (2):151-154.
M. Woods (2001). Balancing Rights and Duties in 'Life and Death' Decision Making Involving Children: A Role for Nurses? Nursing Ethics 8 (5):397-408.
Paula A. Monopoli, Nonmarital Children and Post-Death Parentage: A Different Path for Inheritance Law?
Kristin Zeiler (2009). Deadly Pluralism? Why Death-Concept, Death-Definition, Death-Criterion and Death-Test Pluralism Should Be Allowed, Even Though It Creates Some Problems. Bioethics 23 (8):450-459.
Stephen Hetherington (2013). Where is the Harm in Dying Prematurely? An Epicurean Answer. Journal of Ethics 17 (1-2):79-97.
Daniel I. Wikler (1984). Conceptual Issues in the Definition of Death: A Guide for Public Policy. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 5 (2).
J. Johansson (2012). The Time of Death's Badness. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (5):464-479.
Edith Wyschogrod (1973). The Phenomenon of Death. New York,Harper & Row.
Kevin R. Williams (ed.) (2002). Nothing Better Than Death: Insights Into Sixty-Two Near-Death Experiences. Xlibris.
Ireneusz Ziemiński (2007). Death is Not an Event in Life: Ludwig Wittgenstein as a Transcendental Idealist. Idealistic Studies 37 (1):51-66.
Anthony L. Brueckner & John Martin Fischer (1986). Why is Death Bad? Philosophical Studies 50 (2):213-221.
Brooke Alan Trisel (2007). What is a Premature Death? Minerva - An Internet Journal of Philosophy 11:54-82.
Added to index2011-11-07
Total downloads6 ( #203,651 of 1,101,119 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #115,950 of 1,101,119 )
How can I increase my downloads?