Austin and perception
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Acta Analytica 16 (27):169-193 (2001)
Some of Austin's general statements about the doctrines of sense-datum philosophy are reviewed. It is concluded that Austin thought that in these doctrines "directly see" is given a new but inadequately explained and defined use. Were this so, the philosophical use of "directly see" would lack a definite sense and this would correspondingly affect the doctrines. They would lack definite truth-value. Against this, it is argued that the philosopher's use of "directly see" does not support Austin's general thesis that the sense-datum doctrines lack truth-value.
|Keywords||Metaphysics Perception Sense Data Truth Value Austin|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Vander Veer & L. Garrett (1964). Austin on Perception. Review of Metaphysics 17 (June):557-567.
Michael G. F. Martin (2003). Sensible Appearances. In T. Baldwin (ed.), The Cambridge History of Philosophy. Cambridge University Press
A. D. P. Kalansuriya (1981). Sense-Data and J.L. Austin: A Re-Examination. Indian Philosophical Quarterly 8 (April):357-371.
Robert Schwartz (2004). To Austin or Not to Austin, That's the Disjunction. Philosophical Studies 120 (1-3):255-263.
Roderick Firth (1964). Austin and the Argument From Illusion. Philosophical Review 73 (July):372-382.
Stephen H. Bickham (1975). What is at Issue in the Ayer-Austin Dispute About Sense-Data. Midwestern Journal of Philosophy 1:1-8.
W. F. R. Hardie (1963). Austin on Perception. Philosophy 38 (July):253-263.
Eugen Fischer (2005). Austin on Sense-Data: Ordinary Language Analysis as 'Therapy'. Grazer Philosophische Studien 70 (1):67-99.
A. J. Ayer (1967). Has Austin Refuted the Sense-Datum Theory? Synthese 17 (June):117-140.
Sam C. Coval & D. D. Todd (1972). Adjusters and Sense-Data. American Philosophical Quarterly 9 (January):107-112.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #239,547 of 1,934,364 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #434,317 of 1,934,364 )
How can I increase my downloads?