Austin and perception
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Acta Analytica 16 (27):169-193 (2001)
Some of Austin's general statements about the doctrines of sense-datum philosophy are reviewed. It is concluded that Austin thought that in these doctrines "directly see" is given a new but inadequately explained and defined use. Were this so, the philosophical use of "directly see" would lack a definite sense and this would correspondingly affect the doctrines. They would lack definite truth-value. Against this, it is argued that the philosopher's use of "directly see" does not support Austin's general thesis that the sense-datum doctrines lack truth-value.
|Keywords||Metaphysics Perception Sense Data Truth Value Austin|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Vander Veer & L. Garrett (1964). Austin on Perception. Review of Metaphysics 17 (June):557-567.
Michael G. F. Martin (2003). Sensible Appearances. In T. Baldwin (ed.), The Cambridge History of Philosophy. Cambridge University Press
A. D. P. Kalansuriya (1981). Sense-Data and J.L. Austin: A Re-Examination. Indian Philosophical Quarterly 8 (April):357-371.
Robert Schwartz (2004). To Austin or Not to Austin, That's the Disjunction. Philosophical Studies 120 (1-3):255-263.
Roderick Firth (1964). Austin and the Argument From Illusion. Philosophical Review 73 (July):372-382.
Stephen H. Bickham (1975). What is at Issue in the Ayer-Austin Dispute About Sense-Data. Midwestern Journal of Philosophy 1:1-8.
W. F. R. Hardie (1963). Austin on Perception. Philosophy 38 (July):253-263.
Eugen Fischer (2005). Austin on Sense-Data: Ordinary Language Analysis as 'Therapy'. Grazer Philosophische Studien 70 (1):67-99.
A. J. Ayer (1967). Has Austin Refuted the Sense-Datum Theory? Synthese 17 (June):117-140.
Sam C. Coval & D. D. Todd (1972). Adjusters and Sense-Data. American Philosophical Quarterly 9 (January):107-112.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #215,183 of 1,790,253 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #427,635 of 1,790,253 )
How can I increase my downloads?