Analysis 62 (4):289–292 (2002)
|Abstract||It is argued that Convention T and Basic Law V of Frege’s Grungesetze share three striking similarities. First, they are universal generalizations that are intuitively plausible because they have so many obvious instances. Second, both are false because they yield contradictions. Third, neither gives rise to a paradox.|
|Keywords||Convention T Basic Law V paradox|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Severin Schroeder (2009). Hempel's Paradox, Law-Likeness and Causal Relations. Philosophical Investigations 32 (3):244-263.
Lars Reuter (2000). Human is What is Born of a Human: Personhood, Rationality, and an European Convention. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (2):181 – 194.
Just Balstad Haffeld, Harald Siem & John-Arne Røttingen (2010). Examining the Global Health Arena: Strengths and Weaknesses of a Convention Approach to Global Health Challenges. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (3):614-628.
Janet E. Lord, David Suozzi & Allyn L. Taylor (2010). Lessons From the Experience of U.N. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Addressing the Democratic Deficit in Global Health Governance. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (3):564-579.
Margaret Gilbert (1983). Agreements, Conventions, and Language. Synthese 54 (3):375 - 407.
Gilbert Hottois (2000). A Philosophical and Critical Analysis of the European Convention of Bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (2):133 – 146.
Michael Rescorla, Convention. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #122,328 of 722,700 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,700 )
How can I increase my downloads?