Does the law of excluded middle require bivalence?
Erkenntnis 31 (1):129 - 137 (1989)
| Abstract | Determining whether the law of excluded middle requires bivalence depends upon whether we are talking about sentences or propositions. If we are talking about sentences, neither side has a decisive case. If we are talking of propositions, there is a strong argument on the side of those who say the excluded middle does require bivalence. I argue that all challenges to this argument can be met. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Stewart Shapiro (2001). Why Anti-Realists and Classical Mathematicians Cannot Get Along. Topoi 20 (1).
Dimiter Vakarelov (1981). Intuitionistic Modal Logics Incompatible with the Law of the Excluded Middle. Studia Logica 40 (2):103 - 111.
Robert Lane (1997). Peirce’s ‘Entanglement’ with the Principles of Excluded Middle and Contradiction. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 33 (3):680 - 703.
Andrea Iacona (2007). Future Contingents and Aristotle's Fantasy (Los Futuros Contingentes y la Fantasía de Aristóteles). Crítica 39 (117):45 - 60.
David DeVidi & Graham Solomon (1999). On Confusions About Bivalence and Excluded Middle. Dialogue 38 (04):785-.
P. Mittelstaedt & E. -W. Stachow (1978). The Principle of Excluded Middle in Quantum Logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 7 (1):181 - 208.
Stotrs McCall (1966). Excluded Middle, Bivalence and Fatalism. Inquiry 9 (1-4):384-386.
Hugh S. Chandler (1967). Excluded Middle. Journal of Philosophy 64 (24):807-814.
Timothy J. Day (1992). Excluded Middle and Bivalence. Erkenntnis 37 (1):93 - 97.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads30 ( #40,877 of 549,122 )Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #10,383 of 549,122 )How can I increase my downloads? |

