Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 62:411-415 (1981)
|Abstract||In ANARCY, STATE AND UTOPIA Robert Nozick says that the fundamental question of political philosophy, one that precedes questions about how the state should be organized, is whether there should be any state at all. In the first part of his book he attempts to justify the state. We argue that he is not successful.|
|Keywords||Nozick anarchism state|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
John T. Sanders (1977). The Free Market Model Versus Government: A Reply to Nozick. Journal of Libertarian Studies 1 (1):35-44.
Helga Varden (2009). Nozick's Reply to the Anarchist. Law and Philosophy 28 (6):585 - 616.
Ralf M. Bader (2011). The Framework for Utopia. In The Cambridge Companion to Nozick's 'Anarchy, State, and Utopia'. Cambridge University Press.
Ralf M. Bader & John Meadowcroft (eds.) (2011). The Cambridge Companion to Nozick's Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Cambridge University Press.
Nicolas Maloberti (2010). The Squirrel and the State. The Independent Review 14 (3):377-387.
David Schmidtz (ed.) (2002). Robert Nozick. Cambridge University Press.
Milton Fisk (1980). Review: Property and the State: A Discussion of Robert Nozick's Anarchy, State, and Utopia. [REVIEW] Noûs 14 (1):99 - 108.
Peter Vallentyne (2007). Review of Dale F. Murray, Nozick, Autonomy and Compensation. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2007 (12).
A. R. Lacey (2001). Robert Nozick. Princeton University Press.
Helga Varden (2009). Nozick's Reply to the Anarchist What He Said and What He Should Have Said About Procedural Rights. Law and Philosophy 28 (6):585-616.
Added to index2011-02-21
Total downloads50 ( #21,064 of 548,969 )
Recent downloads (6 months)19 ( #2,952 of 548,969 )
How can I increase my downloads?