David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 7 (1-4):143 – 162 (1964)
We attempt to clarify the nature of philosophic assertions about perception by considering how one can argue effectively against such assertions. Reasons are given, with illustrative assertions from Aristotle and Berkeley, why one cannot argue effectively against such either (1) by arguing for contrary assertions in competing theories or (2) by appealing to scientific observation. Effective arguments against such accounts include (1) those which demonstrate inconsistency within the account, (2) those which disclose an unintelligibility within the account, and (3) those which show the account is inadequate in scope. These are illustrated respectively by arguments (i) against Phenomenalism, (ii) against Aristotle's account of the identity in act of sensing faculty and sensed object, and (iii) against Berkeley's account of observation through instruments.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Richard Mckeon (1941). The Basic Works of Aristotle. Journal of Philosophy 38 (20):553-555.
Roderick M. Chisholm (1948). The Problem of Empiricism. Journal of Philosophy 45 (19):512-517.
D. M. Armstrong (1960/1988). Berkeley's Theory of Vision: A Critical Examination of Bishop Berkeley's Essay Towards a New Theory of Vision. Garland Pub..
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Harold I. Brown (1987). Observation And Objectivity. Oxford University Press.
Stephan Torre (2010). Centered Assertion. Philosophical Studies 150 (1):97-114.
Matthew Weiner (2005). Must We Know What We Say? Philosophical Review 114 (2):227-251.
Isidora Stojanovic (2007). Talking About Taste: Disagreement, Implicit Arguments, and Relative Truth. [REVIEW] Linguistics and Philosophy 30 (6):691-706.
Paul Hurley (2002). A Davidsonian Reconciliation of Internalism, Objectivity, and the Belief-Desire Theory. Journal of Ethics 6 (1):1-20.
Kenneth L. Pearce (2008). The Semantics of Sense Perception in Berkeley. Religious Studies 44 (3):249-268.
Jukka Mikkonen (2009). Assertions in Literary Fiction. Minerva 13:144-180.
Stephen Everson (1997). Aristotle on Perception. Oxford University Press.
Jerry A. Fodor (1984). Observation Reconsidered. Philosophy of Science 51 (March):23-43.
Jody Graham (1997). Common Sense and Berkeley's Perception by Suggestion. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (3):397 – 423.
Added to index2009-03-05
Total downloads9 ( #246,576 of 1,725,861 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,716 of 1,725,861 )
How can I increase my downloads?