David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 106 (4):519-524 (2012)
Women currently earn 77 cents for every dollar earned by men. Explanations abound for why, exactly, this wage gap exists. One of the more potent justifications attributes this pay differential to the unequal effects of marriage on the sexes: the marital asymmetry hypothesis. However, even when marital status is accounted for, a small but significant residual gap remains. This article argues that this is the result of social factors. Entrenched societal sexism causes all of us to harbor unconscious bias about the capabilities and proper gender roles of women. This bias, in turn, leads us to discount work completed by females, especially in professional environments. Employers are not immune from this effect, and the undervaluation of female ability affects hiring practices, leading to the residual wage gap
|Keywords||Feminism Discrimination Pay gap Wage differentials Sexism Marital asymmetry|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Walter Block, Nicholas Snow & Edward Stringham (2008). Banks, Insurance Companies, and Discrimination1. Business and Society Review 113 (3):403-419.
Walter Block (1992). Discrimination: An Interdisciplinary Analysis. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 11 (4):241 - 254.
Deborah Walker, Jerry W. Dauterive, Elyssa Schultz & Walter Block (2004). The Feminist Competition/Cooperation Dichotomy. Journal of Business Ethics 55 (3):243 - 254.
Michael E. Levin (1987). Feminism and Freedom. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Robin Fox (1999). Defending the Young: Female Aggression, Resources, Dominance, and the Emptiness of Patriarchy. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):224-225.
Craig A. Peterson & James Philpot (2007). Women's Roles on U.S. Fortune 500 Boards: Director Expertise and Committee Memberships. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 72 (2):177 - 196.
Anne Campbell (1999). The Last Days of Discord? Evolution and Culture as Accounts of Female–Female Aggression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):237-246.
Marc A. Johnston & Charles B. Crawford (1999). Stigmatizing Women's Aggressive Behavior: Who Does It Benefit and Why? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):226-227.
Deborah Boyle (2013). Margaret Cavendish on Gender, Nature, and Freedom. Hypatia 28 (3):516-532.
Emmanuella Plakoyiannaki, Kalliopi Mathioudaki, Pavlos Dimitratos & Yorgos Zotos (2008). Images of Women in Online Advertisements of Global Products: Does Sexism Exist? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 83 (1):101 - 112.
Luce Irigaray (2007). Je, Tu, Nous: Toward a Culture of Difference: With a Personal Note by the Author. Routledge.
Jan Selmer & Alicia S. M. Leung (2003). Are Corporate Career Development Activities Les Available to Female Than to Male Expatriates? Journal of Business Ethics 43 (1-2):125 - 136.
Judith G. Oakley (2000). Gender-Based Barriers to Senior Management Positions: Understanding the Scarcity of Female CEOs. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 27 (4):321 - 334.
Michael Burke (2004). What Would Happen If a 'Woman' Outpaced the Winner of the Gold Medal in the 'Men's' One Hundred Meters? Philosophy in the Contemporary World 11 (1):35-43.
Janne Chung & Gary S. Monroe (2003). Exploring Social Desirability Bias. Journal of Business Ethics 44 (4):291 - 302.
Herjeet Marway (2011). Scandalous Subwomen and Sublime Superwomen: Exploring Portrayals of Female Suicide Bombers' Agency. Journal of Global Ethics 7 (3):221-240.
Siri Terjesen & Val Singh (2008). Female Presence on Corporate Boards: A Multi-Country Study of Environmental Context. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 83 (1):55 - 63.
Nicholas Pound & Martin Daly (2000). Functional Significance of Human Female Orgasm Still Hypothetical. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):620-621.
Diane Shoos (1992). Review: The Female Subject of Popular Culture. [REVIEW] Hypatia 7 (2):215 - 226.
Added to index2011-10-14
Total downloads36 ( #111,649 of 1,796,251 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #349,760 of 1,796,251 )
How can I increase my downloads?