High need patients receiving targeted entitlements: what responsibilities do they have in primary health care?
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (5):304-306 (2005)
Patient responsibilities in primary health care are controversial and, by comparison, the responsibilities of high need patients are less clear. This paper aims to suggest why high need patients receiving targeted entitlements in primary health care are free to have prima facie special responsibilities; why, given this freedom, these patients morally have special responsibilities; what these responsibilities are, and how publicly funded health systems ought to be able to respond when these remain unmet. It is suggested that the special responsibilities and their place in public policy acquire moral significance as a means to discharge a moral debt, share special knowledge, and produce desirable consequences in regard to personal and collective interests. Special responsibilities magnify ordinary patient responsibilities and require patients not to hesitate regarding attendance for primary health care. Persistent patient disregard of special responsibilities may necessitate limiting the scope of these responsibilities, removing system barriers, or respecifying special rights
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
H. E. Emson (1992). Rights, Duties and Responsibilities in Health Care. Journal of Applied Philosophy 9 (1):3-11.
E. Haavi Morreim (1994). Of Rescue and Responsibility: Learning to Live with Limits. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (5):455-470.
S. Buetow (1998). The Scope for the Involvement of Patients in Their Consultations with Health Professionals: Rights, Responsibilities and Preferences of Patients. Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (4):243-247.
Tony Hope, John Mcmillan & Elaine Hill (2010). Intensive Care Triage: Priority Should Be Independent of Whether Patients Are Already Receiving Intensive Care. Bioethics 26 (5):259-266.
Daniel Callahan (2001). Health Care for Children: A Community Perspective. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (2):137 – 146.
Stephen R. Latham (2011). The "Real-Life" Death Panel, Reformed. Hastings Center Report 41 (1):53-53.
Howard J. Curzer (1993). Is Care a Virtue for Health Care Professionals? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (1):51-69.
Wang Ying Hill, Ian Fraser & Philip Cotton (1998). Patients' Voices, Rights and Responsibilities: On Implementing Social Audit in Primary Health Care. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 17 (13):1481-1497.
Robert A. Pearlman (1992). An Ethical Framework for Rationing Health Care. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (1):79-96.
David T. Ozar (1984). Patients' Autonomy: Three Models of the Professional-Lay Relationship in Medicine. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 5 (1).
Matthew K. Wynia (2007). Ethics and Public Health Emergencies: Encouraging Responsibility. American Journal of Bioethics 7 (4):1 – 4.
Jerry Goodstein (2002). Fulfilling Institutional Responsibilities in Health Care. Business Ethics Quarterly 12 (4):433-450.
John Hardwig (1987). Robin Hoods and Good Samaritans: The Role of Patients in Health Care Distribution. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 8 (1).
Eugene J. Stein (1980). Doctors and Patients: Partners or Adversaries? [REVIEW] Bioethics Quarterly 2 (2):118-122.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads5 ( #242,089 of 1,140,310 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #140,127 of 1,140,310 )
How can I increase my downloads?