David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In Mario de Caro & David Macarthur (eds.), Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association. Columbia University Press. 7 - 22 (2010)
This essay argues that normative judgments, in general, and moral judgments, in particular, are "truth apt" and can be objects of belief. Other main claims are: judgments about reasons, if interpreted as true, do not have metaphysical implications that are incompatible with a scientific view of the world. Two kinds of normative claims should be distinguished: substantive claims about what reasons people have and structural claims about what attitudes people must have insofar as they are rational. Employing this distinction, the practical significance of substantive normative judgments is explained, and critical analysis of expressivist and Kantian views on this question is offered
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Ruth Chang (2013). Grounding Practical Normativity: Going Hybrid. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 164 (1):163-187.
Tristram McPherson (2011). Against Quietist Normative Realism. Philosophical Studies 154 (2):223-240.
Stephen Finlay (2010). Recent Work on Normativity. Analysis 70 (2):331-346.
Stephen Finlay (2010). What Ought Probably Means, and Why You Can't Detach It. Synthese 177 (1):67 - 89.
James Lenman (2007). Expressivism and Epistemology: What is Moral Inquiry? Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 81 (1):63–81.
Similar books and articles
Garrath Williams, Kant's Account of Reason. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Immanuel Kant (1949/1976). Critique of Practical Reason, and Other Writings in Moral Philosophy. Garland Pub..
Gary Banham (2007). Practical Schematism, Teleology and the Unity of the Metaphysics of Morals. In Kyriaki Goudeli, Pavlos Kontos & Iolis Patellis (eds.), Kant: Making Reason Intuitive. Palgrave Macmillan.
Manfred Kuehn (2010). Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: The History and Significance of its Deferral. In Lara Denis (ed.), Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.
Claudia M. Schmidt (2005). The Anthropological Dimension of Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals. Kant-Studien 96 (1):66-84.
Jim Cheney (1991). Callicott's “Metaphysics of Morals”. Environmental Ethics 13 (4):311-325.
Mark Timmons (ed.) (2002). Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: Interpetative Essays. Oxford University Press.
Allen Wood (1998). The Final Form of Kant's Practical Philosophy. Southern Journal of Philosophy 36 (S1):1-20.
Immanuel Kant (1970). The Essential Kant. New York,New American Library.
Paul Guyer (2010). Moral Feelings in the Metaphysics of Morals. In Lara Denis (ed.), Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2010-05-19
Total downloads114 ( #11,651 of 1,679,435 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #25,869 of 1,679,435 )
How can I increase my downloads?