A Necessary Falsehood in the Third Man Argument

Phronesis 37 (2):216-232 (1992)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/156852892321052614
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,661
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
D. T. J. Bailey (2009). The Third Man Argument. Philosophy Compass 4 (4):666-681.
Roberto Casati & Achille C. Varzi (2000). True and False: An Exchange. In André Chapuis & Anil Gupta (eds.), Circularity, Definition, and Truth. Indian Council of Philosophical Research 365-370.
Albert E. Avey (1949). Truth and Falsehood, Mostly Falsehood. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 23:47 - 67.
Zhi-Hue Wang (2008). Plato's Third Man Argument. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 2:197-203.
Rufus Duits (2007). On Tugendhat's Analysis of Heidegger's Concept of Truth. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15 (2):207 – 223.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

13 ( #194,523 of 1,726,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #289,836 of 1,726,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.