A critique of Weisberg's view on the periodic table and some speculations on the nature of classifications
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Foundations of Chemistry 14 (3):275-284 (2012)
This article carefully analyzes a recent paper by Weisberg in which it is claimed that when Mendeleev discovered the periodic table he was not working as a modeler but instead as a theorist. I argue that Weisberg is mistaken in several respects and that the periodic table should be regarded as a classification, not as a theory. In the second part of the article an attempt is made to elevate the status of classifications by suggesting that they provide a form of ‘side-ways explanation’
|Keywords||Mendeleev Periodic table Theory Classification Explanation Models Shapere|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Nancy Cartwright (1999). The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Tarja Knuuttila & Andrea Loettgers (forthcoming). Modelling as Indirect Representation? The Lotka–Volterra Model Revisited. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science:axv055.
Similar books and articles
Eric R. Scerri (2005). On the Formalization of the Periodic Table. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 84 (1):191-210.
Maurice R. Kibler (2007). From the Mendeleev Periodic Table to Particle Physics and Back to the Periodic Table. Foundations of Chemistry 9 (3):221-234.
Eric R. Scerri (1997). Has the Periodic Table Been Successfully Axiomatized? Erkenntnis 47 (2):229-243.
Geoff Rayner-Canham (2011). Isodiagonality in the Periodic Table. Foundations of Chemistry 13 (2):121-129.
Geoff Rayner-Canham (2013). Periodic Patterns: The Group (N) and Group (N + 10) Linkage. [REVIEW] Foundations of Chemistry 15 (2):229-237.
Mark Weinstein (2011). Arguing Towards Truth: The Case of the Periodic Table. [REVIEW] Argumentation 25 (2):185-197.
Santiago Alvarez, Joaquim Sales & Miquel Seco (2008). On Books and Chemical Elements. Foundations of Chemistry 10 (2):79-100.
Eric Scerri (2005). Some Aspects of the Metaphysics of Chemistry and the Nature of the Elements. Hyle 11 (2):127 - 145.
G. W. Rayner-Canham (2007). Eric R. Scerri, the Periodic Table: Its Story and its Significance. [REVIEW] Foundations of Chemistry 9 (2):215-218.
Eric Scerri & John Worrall (2001). Prediction and the Periodic Table. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 32 (3):407-452.
Pieter Thyssen (2010). Eric R. Scerri: Selected Papers on the Periodic Table. [REVIEW] Foundations of Chemistry 12 (3):235-238.
Bretislav Friedrich (2004). ... Hasn't It? A Commentary on Eric Scerri's Paper ``has Quantum Mechanics Explained the Periodic Table?''. Foundations of Chemistry 6 (1):117-132.
Francis T. Marchese (2013). Periodicity, Visualization, and Design. Foundations of Chemistry 15 (1):31-55.
Octavio Novaro (2008). On the Rightful Place for He Within the Periodic Table. Foundations of Chemistry 10 (1):3-12.
Added to index2012-07-26
Total downloads9 ( #363,867 of 1,907,077 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #467,622 of 1,907,077 )
How can I increase my downloads?