Graduate studies at Western
Foundations of Chemistry 8 (3):285-292 (2006)
|Abstract||This commentary provides a critical examination of a recent article by Allen and Knight in which the authors claim to provide the long-sought explanation for the Madelung, or n + ℓ, n rule for the order of orbital filling in many-electron atoms. It is concluded that the explanation is inadequate for several reasons|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Denis O'Hora & Dermot Barnes-Holmes (2001). Stepping Up to the Challenge of Complex Human Behavior: A Response to Ribes-Iñesta's Response. Behavior and Philosophy 29:59 - 60.
Markus E. Schlosser (2012). Free Will and the Unconscious Precursors of Choice. Philosophical Psychology 25 (3):365-384.
Allen I. Goldberg (2000). Commentary. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 9 (1):113-117.
Seth Shabo (2011). Agency Without Avoidability: Defusing a New Threat to Frankfurt's Counterexample Strategy. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (4):505-522.
Albert Breton & M. J. Trebilcock (eds.) (2006). Bijuralism: An Economic Approach. Ashgate Pub. Company.
Cecilia M. Heyes & Anthony Dickinson (1995). Folk Psychology Won't Go Away: Response to Allen and Bekoff. Mind and Language 10 (4):329-332.
Allen Esterson & Stephen J. Ceci (2006). Freud Did Not Anticipate Modern Reconstructive Memory Processes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (5):517-518.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #154,984 of 740,279 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?