About a “Contextuality Loophole” in Bell’s Theorem Claimed to Exist by Nieuwenhuizen

Foundations of Physics 47 (1):117-119 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Nieuwenhuizen argued that there exists some “contextuality loophole” in Bell’s theorem. This claim is unjustified. In Bell’s theorem non-contextuality is not presupposed but derived from Einstein causality using the EPR argument.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Conway–Kochen and the Finite Precision Loophole.Ronnie Hermens - 2014 - Foundations of Physics 44 (10):1038-1048.
Logical Bell Inequalities.Samson Abramsky & Lucien Hardy - 2012 - Physical Review A 85:062114-1 - 062114-11.
The Bell Theorem as a Special Case of a Theorem of Bass.Karl Hess & Walter Philipp - 2005 - Foundations of Physics 35 (10):1749-1767.
Philosophical Implications of Bell's Theorem.Niall Shanks - 1987 - Dissertation, University of Alberta (Canada)

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-28

Downloads
12 (#1,025,624)

6 months
3 (#902,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references