David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Cambridge University Press (2003)
In his book Frederic Schick develops his challenge to standard decision theory. He argues that talk of the beliefs and desires of an agent is not sufficient to explain choices. To account for a given choice we need to take into consideration how the agent understands the problem, how he sees in a selective way the options open to him. The author applies his new logic to a host of common human predicaments. Why do people in choice experiments act so often against expectations? Why do people cooperate in situations where textbook logic predicts that they won't? What exactly is weakness of will? What are people reporting when they say their lives have no meaning for them? This book questions the foundations of technical and philosophical decision theory and will appeal to all those who work in that field, be they philosophers, economists or psychologists.
|Keywords||Decision making Ambiguity Logic|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$12.00 used (87% off) $20.00 new (78% off) $88.00 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||BD184.S335 2003|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Kenny Easwaran (2011). Bayesianism I: Introduction and Arguments in Favor. Philosophy Compass 6 (5):312-320.
José Luis Bermúdez (2010). Pitfalls for Realistic Decision Theory: An Illustration From Sequential Choice. Synthese 176 (1):23 - 40.
Stephen Ellis (2006). Multiple Objectives: A Neglected Problem in the Theory of Human Action. Synthese 153 (2):313 - 338.
Paul Weirich (2007). Initiating Coordination. Philosophy of Science 74 (5):790-801.
Stephen Ellis (2006). Multiple Objectives: A Neglected Problem in the Theory of Human Action. Synthese 153 (2):313-338.
Similar books and articles
Thomas Vetterlein (2008). A Way to Interpret Łukasiewicz Logic and Basic Logic. Studia Logica 90 (3):407 - 423.
W. Kip Viscusi & Harrell Chesson (1999). Hopes and Fears: The Conflicting Effects of Risk Ambiguity. Theory and Decision 47 (2):157-184.
Richard Kaye (1991). A Generalization of Specker's Theorem on Typical Ambiguity. Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (2):458-466.
Nicholas Rescher & Alan Ross Anderson (eds.) (1966). The Logic of Decision and Action. Pittsburgh]University of Pittsburgh Press.
Giovanni B. Moneta (1991). Ambiguity, Inductive Systems, and the Modeling of Subjective Probability Judgements. Philosophical Psychology 4 (2):267 – 285.
Erik J. Olsson (2005). Ambiguity and Logic, by Frederic Schick. Cambridge University Press, 2003, IX + 154 Pages. [REVIEW] Economics and Philosophy 21 (1):161-164.
Reed Richter (1984). Rationality Revisited. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62 (4):392 – 403.
Giuseppe Attanasi & Aldo Montesano (2012). The Price for Information About Probabilities and its Relation with Risk and Ambiguity. Theory and Decision 73 (1):125-160.
Frederic Schick (1997). Making Choices: A Recasting of Decision Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Frederic Schick (1991). Understanding Action: An Essay on Reasons. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads23 ( #204,499 of 1,932,455 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #197,462 of 1,932,455 )
How can I increase my downloads?