David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
HEC Forum 25 (2):161-171 (2013)
Conversations with patients and families about the allow-natural-death (AND) order, along with the standard do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order during end-of-life (EOL) decision-making, may create engagement and understanding while promoting care that can be defended using enduring notions of autonomy, beneficence, and professional duty. Ethical, legal, and pragmatic issues surrounding EOL care decision-making seem to suggest discussion of AND orders as one strategy clinicians could consider at the individual practice level and at institutional levels. A discussion of AND orders, along with traditional DNR orders is presented. This is followed by argument and counter-argument focused on ethical, legal, and practical issues germane to EOL care decision-making associated with use of AND orders
|Keywords||Allow-natural-death Do-not-resuscitate End-of-life care Advance directives|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
M. Pabst Battin (1983). The Least Worst Death. Hastings Center Report 13 (2):13-16.
Jeffrey Bishop, Kyle Brothers, Joshua Perry & Ayesha Ahmad (2010). Reviving the Conversation Around CPR/DNR. American Journal of Bioethics 10 (1):61-67.
Y.-Y. Chen & S. J. Youngner (2008). "Allow Natural Death" is Not Equivalent to "Do Not Resuscitate": A Response. Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (12):887-888.
Jillian Clare Cohen (2004). Pushing the Borders: The Moral Dilemma of International Internet Pharmacies. Hastings Center Report 34 (2):15-17.
Carolyn Ells (2010). Levels of Intervention: Communicating with More Precision About Planned Use of Critical Interventions. American Journal of Bioethics 10 (1):78-79.
Citations of this work BETA
F. C. Weidema, T. A. Abma, G. A. M. Widdershoven & A. C. Molewijk (2011). Client Participation in Moral Case Deliberation: A Precarious Relational Balance. [REVIEW] HEC Forum 23 (3):207-224.
Similar books and articles
Riccardo Guastini (2000). On Legal Order: Some Criticism of the Received View. [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (3):263-272.
Anthony Reeves (2011). Judicial Practical Reason: Judges in Morally Imperfect Legal Orders. Law and Philosophy 30 (3):319-352.
Stéphanie Hennette-Vauchez, When Ambivalent Principles Prevail: Leads for Explaining Western Legal Orders' Infatuation with the Human Dignity Principle.
Richard Huxtable (2009). The Suicide Tourist Trap: Compromise Across Boundaries. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (3):327-336.
Fred Feldman (1992). Confrontations with the Reaper: A Philosophical Study of the Nature and Value of Death. Oxford University Press.
Jean D'Aspremont & Frédéric Dopagne, Two Constitutionalisms in Europe: Pursuing an Articulation of the European and International Legal Orders.
Marisa Reddy Randazzo & Michelle Keeney (2009). Threats Against Public Officials : Considerations for Risk Assessment, Reporting, and Intervention. In James L. Werth, Elizabeth Reynolds Welfel & G. Andrew H. Benjamin (eds.), The Duty to Protect: Ethical, Legal, and Professional Considerations for Mental Health Professionals. American Psychological Association.
Barry Rosenfeld, Joanna Fava & Michele Galietta (2009). Working with the Stalking Offender : Considerations for Risk Assessment and Intervention. In James L. Werth, Elizabeth Reynolds Welfel & G. Andrew H. Benjamin (eds.), The Duty to Protect: Ethical, Legal, and Professional Considerations for Mental Health Professionals. American Psychological Association.
Neil Walker (2011). Reconciling MacCormick: Constitutional Pluralism and the Unity of Practical Reason. Ratio Juris 24 (4):369-385.
Owen J. Anderson (2012). The Natural Moral Law: The Good After Modernity. Cambridge University Press.
S. J. (2000). Trial by Slogan: Natural Law and Lex Iniusta Non Est Lex. Law and Philosophy 19 (4):433-449.
Emily M. Scheiderer (2011). Elder Abuse: Ethical and Related Considerations for Professionals in Psychology. Ethics and Behavior 22 (1):75 - 87.
Added to index2012-07-01
Total downloads6 ( #201,648 of 1,098,611 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #285,544 of 1,098,611 )
How can I increase my downloads?