Review: Andreas Hüttemann: what's wrong with microphysicalism?
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (2):253-257 (2008)
| Abstract | In What’s Wrong With Microphysicalism?, Andreas H üttemann argues against the ontological priority of the microphysical, in favour of a ‘pluralism’ that accepts physical systems of all scales as interdependent equals. This is thoughtful and original work, deploying an understanding of the relevant physics to mount a serious challenge to the dominant microphysicalist view. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesAndreas Hüttemann (2002). Chaos Und Naturgesetz: Cartesische Probleme. Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 56 (4):517 - 544.
Andreas Hüttemann (2004). Naturzustand Und Staatsvertrag Bei Hobbes. Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 58 (1):29 - 53.
Andreas Hüttemann (2004). Leibniz: Raum. In Ansgar Beckermann & Dominik Perler (eds.), Klassiker der Philosopie heute. Reclam.
Andreas Hüttemann & David Papineau (2005). Physicalism Decomposed. Analysis 65 (285):33-39.
Holger Lyre (2008). Is Really Something Wrong with Microphysicalism? Andreas Hüttemann, “What's Wrong with Microphysicalism?”. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 39 (1):167-171.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads44 ( #25,377 of 549,196 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,418 of 549,196 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
