David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:351-356 (2007)
This paper examines the motivation theory of Rowley and Moldoveanu (2003) on shareholder activism in the context of shareholder resolution networks. Shareholder resolution filings occur both within subnetworks as well as across subnetworks, indicating these motivations are mixed. I extend the motivational issue by also examining the response of the corporation to such activism. That resolutions might migrate from identity to interest motivated groups is examined as an element of future research.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Robert L. Laud & Donald H. Schepers (2009). Beyond Transparency: Information Overload and a Model for Intelligibility. Business and Society Review 114 (3):365-391.
Similar books and articles
Emmanuel Adegbite, Kenneth Amaeshi & Olufemi Amao (2012). The Politics of Shareholder Activism in Nigeria. Journal of Business Ethics 105 (3):389-402.
Joakim Sandberg (2011). Changing the World Through Shareholder Activism? Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 5 (1):51-78.
Olufemi Amao & Kenneth Amaeshi (2008). Galvanising Shareholder Activism: A Prerequisite for Effective Corporate Governance and Accountability in Nigeria. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 82 (1):119 - 130.
Jeanne M. Logsdon & Harry J. Van Buren (2009). Beyond the Proxy Vote: Dialogues Between Shareholder Activists and Corporations. Journal of Business Ethics 87 (1):353 - 365.
Kathleen Rehbein, Jeanne M. Logsdon & Harry J. Buren (2013). Corporate Responses to Shareholder Activists: Considering the Dialogue Alternative. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 112 (1):137-154.
Elias Bengtsson (2007). Organisational Approaches to Corporate Governance: An Empirical Study on Shareholder Activism. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 3 (3):238-249.
Aaron A. Dhir (2012). Shareholder Engagement in the Embedded Business Corporation. Business Ethics Quarterly 22 (1):99-118.
Peter Koslowski (2000). The Limits of Shareholder Value. Journal of Business Ethics 27 (1-2):137 - 148.
Sara A. Morris (2009). Corporate Targets of Shareholder Resolutions. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 20:36-46.
Thomas A. Hemphill (2007). The US Securities and Exchange Commission and Shareholder Director Nominations: Paving the Way for Special Interest Directors? International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 3 (1):19-32.
Jeanne M. Logsdon, Harry van Buren Iii & Kathleen Rehbein (2008). Social Responsibility Ratings and Corporate Responses to Activist Shareholder Resolutions. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 19:307-317.
Frederick C. Dunbar & Arun Sen, Counterfactual Keys to Causation and Damages in Shareholder Class Actions.
Douglas M. McCabe (2000). Global Labor and Worksite Standards: A Strategic Ethical Analysis of Shareholder Employee Relations Resolutions. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 23 (1):101 - 110.
Wajeeh Elali (2006). Contemporaneous Relationship Between Eva and Shareholder Value. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 2 (s 3-4):237-253.
Added to index2012-09-18
Total downloads3 ( #483,044 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #289,836 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?