Inquiry 35 (1):69 – 80 (1992)
|Abstract||After commending Yovel for his revisionist account of the history of modem philosophy, I comment on the way in which it indirectly illuminates what sets the existentialist movement apart. I then question Yovel's interpretations of Hegel, Marx, and Nietzsche on a number of points where he seems to me to misrepresent, exaggerate, or underappreciate them quite uncharacteristically. I conclude by suggesting that the way in which he has chosen to tell the story he tells may have had something to do with it|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Joakim Sigvardson (2002). Immanence and Transcendence in Thomas Pynchon's Mason & Dixon: A Phenomenological Study. Almquist & Wiksell International.
Tao Jiang (2005). Accessibility of the Subliminal Mind: Transcendence Vs. Immanence. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 38 (3-4):143-164.
Kathrin Thiele (2010). 'To Believe In This World, As It Is': Immanence and the Quest for Political Activism. Deleuze Studies 4 (supplement):28-45.
Ian J. Thompson (1993). The Consistency of Physical Law with Divine Immanence. Science and Christian Belief 5:19-36.
Zeynep Direk (2011). Immanence and Abjection in Simone de Beauvoir. Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (1):49-72.
Miguel de Beistegui (2005). The Vertigo of Immanence: Deleuze's Spinozism. Research in Phenomenology 35 (1):77-100.
Gilles Deleuze (2001). Pure Immanence: Essays on a Life. Distributed by the Mit Press.
Yirmiyahu Yovel (1989/1992). Spinoza and Other Heretics. Princeton University Press.
Yirmiyahu Yovel (1992). Spinoza and Other Heretics: Reply to Critics. Inquiry 35 (1):81 – 112.
Added to index2009-01-30
Total downloads2 ( #246,081 of 722,864 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?