American Philosophical Quarterly 43 (4):315 - 328 (2006)
|Abstract||The paper deals with the semantics and ontology of ordinary discourse about properties. The main focus lies on the following thesis: A simple predication of the form ‘a is F’ is synonymous with the corresponding explicit property-attribution ‘a has F-ness’. An argument against this Synonymy Thesis is put forth which is based on the thesis that simple predications and property-attributions differ in their conditions of understanding. In defending the argument, the paper accounts for the way in which we come to adopt the conceptual framework of properties.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
David Robb (2005). Qualitative Unity and the Bundle Theory. The Monist 88 (4):466-92.
Michael Esfeld, Do Relations Require Underlying Intrinsic Properties? A Physical Argument for a Metaphysics of Relations.
Nick Zangwill (2000). Skin Deep or in the Eye of the Beholder?: The Metaphysics of Aesthetic and Sensory Properties. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (3):595-618.
Julian Dodd (2002). Defending Musical Platonism. British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (4):380-402.
Tim Crane (2008). Causation and Determinable Properties : On the Efficacy of Colour, Shape, and Size. In Jakob Hohwy & Jesper Kallestrup (eds.), Being Reduced: New Essays on Reduction, Explanation, and Causation. Oxford University Press.
Anjan Chakravartty (2003). The Dispositional Essentialist View of Properties and Laws. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 11 (4):393 – 413.
Robert Fudge (2005). A Vindication of Strong Aesthetic Supervenience. Philosophical Papers 34 (2):149-171.
Robert Schroer (2010). How Far Can the Physical Sciences Reach? American Philosophical Quarterlly 47 (3):253-266.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads31 ( #39,311 of 549,070 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,070 )
How can I increase my downloads?