Graduate studies at Western
Phronesis 54 (4):326-345 (2009)
|Abstract||The current debate over Aristotle's commitment to prime matter is centered on diachronic considerations found in his theory of substantial change. I argue that an appeal to this theory is not required in order to establish his commitment to the existence of prime matter. By drawing on Physics II.1's conception of what it is for an element to have a nature - that is, to have an inner source of movement and rest - I introduce a synchronic justification for the existence of prime matter. By trading on the relationship between the thing that has a source of change and the source it has , I show that something that has a source in itself cannot be identical with its source, and that a type of matter that has no nature of its own (a kind of prime matter) is required to block this identification at the level of the elements.|
|Keywords||METAPHYSICS ELEMENTS FORM MATTER ARISTOTLE NATURE|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Paul Studtmann (2006). Prime Matter and Extension in Aristotle. Journal of Philosophical Research 31:171-184.
James G. Snyder (2008). The Theory of Materia Prima in Marsilio Ficino's Platonic Theology. Vivarium 46 (2):192-221.
Frans A. J. de Haas (1997). John Philoponus' New Definition of Prime Matter: Aspects of its Background in Neoplatonism and the Ancient Commentary Tradition. E.J. Brill.
Jonathan Beere (2006). Potentiality and the Matter of Composite Substance. Phronesis 51 (4):303 - 329.
Charles Huenemann (2004). Spinoza and Prime Matter. Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (1):21-32.
H. M. Robinson (1974). Prime Matter in Aristotle. Phronesis 19 (2):168 - 188.
H. M. Robinson (1974). Prime Matter in Aristotle. Phronesis 19 (1):168-188.
Added to index2009-10-03
Total downloads79 ( #12,257 of 739,396 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #14,948 of 739,396 )
How can I increase my downloads?