Blind grasping and Fregean senses

Philosophical Studies 62 (3):263 - 287 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The foregoing considerations have shown that on the Fregean model, no descriptive rendition of the meaning of a word, and no feature of the subject's psychological state, will be sufficient to answer the question of how reference takes place. Reference is determined by an independent semantical object, and the mind is limited by its perceptual access to this external semantical realm. The psychological and epistemic states of the language user will be causally influenced by this perceptual contact, and such causal influences will enable the subject to evince the appropriate behavioral signs of comprehension. But the internal effects produced by the perception of meaning are not in principle sufficient to individuate their semantical causes, and hence some of the prominent criticisms of the traditional theory are simply not applicable to Frege's system.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Taxonomising the Senses.Fiona Macpherson - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 153 (1):123-142.
The number of senses.Kevin C. Klement - 2003 - Erkenntnis 58 (3):303 - 323.
The ontology of meanings. [REVIEW]Mark Siebel - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 137 (3):417 - 426.
Empty names.Ben Caplan - 2002 - Dissertation, Ucla
Fregean propositions and their graspability.Elisabetta Sacchi - 2006 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 72 (1):73-94.
The Composition of Thoughts.Richard Heck & Robert May - 2010 - Noûs 45 (1):126-166.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
29 (#497,788)

6 months
1 (#1,241,711)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Schweizer
University of Edinburgh

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

The meaning of 'meaning'.Hilary Putnam - 1975 - Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7:131-193.
Meaning and Reference.Hilary Putnam - 1973 - In Robert B. Talisse & Scott F. Aikin (eds.), The Pragmatism Reader: From Peirce Through the Present. Princeton University Press. pp. 299-308.
What is Cantor's Continuum Problem?Kurt Gödel - 1947 - The American Mathematical Monthly 54 (9):515--525.
Function and Concept.Gottlob Frege - 1960 - In D. H. Mellor & Alex Oliver (eds.), Properties. Oxford University Press. pp. 130-149.
What is Cantor's Continuum Problem?Kurt Gödel - 1983 - In Paul Benacerraf & Hilary Putnam (eds.), Philosophy of Mathematics: Selected Readings (2nd Edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 470-485.

Add more references