'By Leibniz's law': Remarks on a fallacy

Philosophical Quarterly 56 (222):39-54 (2006)
The article is an investigation of a certain form of argument that refers to Leibniz’s Law as its inference ticket (where Leibniz’s Law is understood as the thesis that if x=y.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2005.00427.x
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,280
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Rowland Stout (1997). Processes. Philosophy 72 (279):19-27.
Jerrold Levinson (1978). Properties and Related Entities. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 39 (1):1-22.
Fred Feldman (1970). Leibniz and "Leibniz' Law". Philosophical Review 79 (4):510-522.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

191 ( #20,110 of 1,932,461 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

8 ( #114,730 of 1,932,461 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.