Cognition and Eros: A Critique of the Kantian Paradigm
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Pennsylvania State University Press (1988)
In the dissertation I examine the split between cognition and eros in Kant's notion of objectivity, which has become paradigmatic for modern theories about knowledge. I argue that the split between cognition, on the one hand, and feelings and desires, on the other, does not capture the necessary conditions of knowledge, as Kant claims, but involves a suppression of erotic factors of existence. ;The split between pure knowledge and sensual existence in Kant's thought reflects an ascetic tradition inherited from both Greek and Christian sources, which views the body, sexuality, and in particular women's sexuality as a source of pollution. According to this tradition, since thought must be divested of the pollution of sensuous existence, women's sexuality precludes them from rational activity. Consequently, the philosophical commitment to purity has justified the exclusion of women from the practice of knowledge. ;The particular form of asceticism which is evident in Kant's treatment of sensibility of objective knowledge, of morality, and of aesthetic judgement, reflects the reified nature of relations in an emerging capitalist economy. The suppression of the immediate, sensual qualities in both the subject and object of knowledge, in Kant's system, corresponds to the suppression of the immediate, qualitative features of the subject and object in the process of commodity production. Both persons and things become reduced to a formal abstract equivalence. Kant's notion of objectivity makes normative this objectification of relations between persons and things. ;Thus, the paradigm of objective knowledge is not only damaging to the thinker, who must detach himself from the emotional and sensual facets of existence. It serves as an ideology which has justified the exclusion of women from the pursuit of knowledge, and which more generally legitimates the distorted human relations generated by the world of commodity production. ;By considering Kant's commitment to pure knowledge in the context of the genealogy of the concept of purity, the themes of asceticism and fetishism emerged as mutually illuminating. Implicit in the ascetic denial of sensuality is a dialectic which leads to an objectification of persons and things. Moreover, the fetishism of commodities involves a detachment of erotic interests from persons which results in an obsessive interest in objects
|Keywords||Objectivity History Knowledge, Theory of History Asceticism History Sensuality History Women History|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$32.94 new (9% off) $35.95 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||B2798.S32 1993|
|ISBN(s)||0271009365 0271025549 9780271025544|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Joan C. Tronto (1995). Care as a Basis for Radical Political Judgments. Hypatia 10 (2):141 - 149.
Jeanna Moyer (2001). Why Kant and Ecofeminism Don't Mix. Hypatia 16 (3):79-97.
Dawn Rae Davis (2002). (Love is) the Ability of Not Knowing: Feminist Experience of the Impossible in Ethical Singularity. Hypatia 17 (2):145-161.
Amy Mullin (1995). Selves, Diverse and Divided: Can Feminists Have Diversity Without Multiplicity? Hypatia 10 (4):1 - 31.
Ofelia Schutte (1991). Irigaray on the Problem of Subjectivity1. Hypatia 6 (2):64-76.
Similar books and articles
Joseph Reese Strayer (1943). The Interpretation of History. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Will Durant (2010). Lessons of History. Simon & Schuster Paperbacks.
Eric Watkins (ed.) (2009). Kant's Critique of Pure Reason: Background Source Materials. Cambridge University Press.
Jost Dülffer & Robert Frank (eds.) (2009). Peace, War and Gender From Antiquity to the Present: Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Klartext.
Ernst Cassirer (1963). The Individual and the Cosmos in Renaissance Philosophy. Dover Publications.
Brian P. McLaughlin (ed.) (1991). Dretske and His Critics. Basil Blackwell.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?