Consequentialism and its Critics
Samuel Scheffler (ed.)
Oxford University Press (1988)
|Abstract||In this anthology, distinguished scholars--Thomas Nagel, T.M. Scanlon, John Rawls, Robert Nozick, Samuela Scheffler, Conrad D. Johnson, Bernard Williams, Peter Railton, Amartya Sen, Philippa Foot, and Derek Parfit-- debate arguments for and against the moral doctrine of consequentialism to present a complete view of this important topic in moral philosophy.|
|Buy the book||$3.73 used (91% off) $31.87 new (21% off) $35.85 direct from Amazon (11% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||BJ1031.C595 1988|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Bart Streumer (2003). Can Consequentialism Cover Everything? Utilitas 15 (2):237-47.
Tim Mulgan (2001). The Demands of Consequentialism. Oxford University Press.
Matthew Tedesco (2006). Indirect Consequentialism, Suboptimality, and Friendship. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (4):567–577.
Douglas W. Portmore (forthcoming). Consequentialism. In Christian Miller (ed.), The Continuum Companion to Ethical Theory. Continuum.
Campbell Brown (2011). Consequentialize This. Ethics 121 (4):749-771.
Bernard Williams (1988). Consequentialism and Integrity. In Samuel Scheffler (ed.), Consequentialism and its Critics. Oxford University Press.
Scott Forschler (2009). Truth and Acceptance Conditions for Moral Statements Can Be Identical: Further Support for Subjective Consequentialism. Utilitas 21 (3):337-346.
T. M. Scanlon (2001). Symposium on Amartya Sen's Philosophy: 3 Sen and Consequentialism. Economics and Philosophy 17 (1):39-50.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #232,211 of 548,969 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,969 )
How can I increase my downloads?