Graduate studies at Western
Mind 115 (460):983-1006 (2006)
|Abstract||Although the notion of logical object plays a key role in Frege's foundational project, it has hardly been analyzed in depth so far. I argue that Marco Ruffino's attempt to fill this gap by establishing a close link between Frege's treatment of expressions of the form ‘the concept F’ and the privileged status Frege assigns to extensions of concepts as logical objects is bound to fail. I argue, in particular, that Frege's principal motive for introducing extensions into his logical theory is not to be able to make in-direct statements about concepts, but rather to define all numbers as logical objects of a fundamental kind in order to ensure that we have the right cognitive access to them qua logical objects via Axiom V. Contrary to what Ruffino claims, reducibility to extensions cannot be the ‘ultimate criterion’ for Frege of what is to be regarded as a logical object.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Kevin C. Klement (2012). Frege's Changing Conception of Number. Theoria 78 (2):146-167.
William Demopoulus & William Bell (1993). Frege's Theory of Concepts and Objects and the Interpretation of Second-Order Logict. Philosophia Mathematica 1 (2):139-156.
David J. Anderson & Edward N. Zalta (2004). Frege, Boolos, and Logical Objects. Journal of Philosophical Logic 33 (1):1-26.
Robert May (2005). Frege's Other Program. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 46 (1):1-17.
G. Aldo Antonelli & Robert C. May (2005). Frege's Other Program. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 46 (1):1-17.
Marco Ruffino (2003). Why Frege Would Not Be a Neo-Fregean. Mind 112 (445):51-78.
Marco Ruffino (2000). Extensions as Representative Objects in Frege's Logic. Erkenntnis 52 (2):239-252.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads31 ( #44,928 of 740,197 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,960 of 740,197 )
How can I increase my downloads?