Contexts of Nature according to Aristotle and Descartes

Abstract
From the point of view of the history and philosophy of science, the relationship of Descartes' to Aristotle's concept of nature has not been grasped in an entirely satisfactory way. In this article, the two concepts will be subjected to a comparative analysis, beginning with the outstanding feature that both concepts of nature are characterized by a contradistinction to the non-natural: Aristotle separates nature and technology; Descartes opposes nature to thinking. My thesis is that these meanings have found privileged application in specific contexts of experience: the field of application especially suitable for the Aristotelian concept is the experience of everyday life, while for the Cartesian concept it is subjective experience. Historically, the relationship between meaning and experience is of help in understanding the conditions in which the two concepts arose. The topical relevance of the concepts to modern society is a consequence of the continued existence of the favored contexts of experience. Roughly stated, we sometimes still perceive in an Aristotelian way and at other times think in a Cartesian way
Keywords context  nature  Aristotle  Descartes  subjectivity  dualism  everyday life   techne  physis  thinking
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive Gregor Schiemann, Contexts of Nature according to Aristotle and Descartes
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Michael McGhee (1996). The Locations of the Soul. Religious Studies 32 (2):205 - 221.
Marjolein Oele (2012). Heidegger's Reading of Aristotle's Concept of Pathos. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2):389-406.
Ignacio L. Götz (2003). The Quest for Certainty. Journal of Philosophical Research 28:1-22.
Monte Ransome Johnson (2012). The Medical Background of Aristotle's Theory of Nature and Spontaneity. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 27:105-152.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-12-02

Total downloads

33 ( #53,613 of 1,102,836 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #61,870 of 1,102,836 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.