|Abstract||Deciding matters of legal liability, in torts and other civil actions, requires deciding causation. The injury suffered by a plaintiff must be caused by an event or condition due to the defendant. The courts distinguish between cause-in-fact and proximate causation, where cause-in-fact is determined by the “but-for” test: the effect would not have happened, “but for” the cause.1 Proximate causation is a set of legal limitations on cause-in-fact.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Uwe Meixner (2004). Causation in a New Old Key. Studia Logica 76 (3):343 - 383.
Jonathan Schaffer (2012). Disconnection and Responsibility. Legal Theory 18 (Special Issue 04):399-435.
Frederick C. Dunbar & Arun Sen, Counterfactual Keys to Causation and Damages in Shareholder Class Actions.
Michael S. Moore (2009). Causation and Responsibility: An Essay in Law, Morals, and Metaphysics. OUP Oxford.
Jos Lehmann & Aldo Gangemi (2007). An Ontology of Physical Causation as a Basis for Assessing Causation in Fact and Attributing Legal Responsibility. Artificial Intelligence and Law 15 (3):301-321.
Jos Lehmann, Joost Breuker & Bob Brouwer (2004). Causation in AI and Law. Artificial Intelligence and Law 12 (4):279-315.
Alex Broadbent (2009). Fact and Law in the Causal Inquiry. Legal Theory 15:173-191.
Ernest Sosa (ed.) (1975). Causation and Conditionals. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads18 ( #74,484 of 722,813 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,813 )
How can I increase my downloads?