Philosophical Studies 148 (3):447–454 (2010)
|Abstract||The first third of John Pollock’s Thinking about Acting is on the topics of pleasure, desire, and preference, and these topics are the ones on which this paper focuses. I review Pollock’s position and argue that it has at least one substantial strength (it elegantly demonstrates that desires must be more fundamental than preferences, and embraces this conclusion wholeheartedly) and at least one substantial weakness (it holds to a form of psychological hedonism without convincingly answering the philosophical or empirical objections that might be raised).|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Iain Morrisson (2006). Pleasure in Kant. Journal of Philosophical Research 31:219-232.
Timothy Schroeder (2006). Desire. Philosophy Compass 1 (6):631–639.
Timothy Schroeder (2004). Three Faces of Desire. Oxford University Press.
Chris Heathwood (2011). Desire-Based Theories of Reasons, Pleasure, and Welfare. Oxford Studies in Metaethics 6:79-106.
Klocksiem (2010). Pleasure, Desire, and Oppositeness. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy.
Paul Weirich (2007). Thinking About Acting: Logical Foundations for Rational Decision Making - by John L. Pollock. Philosophical Books 48 (3):283-285.
Chris Heathwood (2006). Desire Satisfactionism and Hedonism. Philosophical Studies 128 (3):539-563.
A. Morton (2008). Review: John L. Pollock: Thinking About Acting: Logical Foundations for Rational Decision Making. [REVIEW] Mind 117 (467):716-719.
John Pollock (2006). Thinking About Acting: Logical Foundations for Rational Decision Making. Oxford University Press.
Branden Fitelson (2010). Pollock on Probability in Epistemology. Philosophical Studies 148 (3).
Added to index2009-12-16
Total downloads29 ( #42,452 of 549,528 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,528 )
How can I increase my downloads?