Philosophical Studies 108 (1-2):99 - 108 (2002)
|Abstract||This paper argues that Descartes conceives of theoretical reason in terms derived from practical reason, particularly in the role he gives to the passions. That the passions serve — under normal circumstances — to preserve the union of mind and body is a well-known feature of Descartes's defense of our native make-up. But they are equally important in our more purely theoretical endeavors. Some passions, most notably wonder, provide a crucial source of motivation in the search after truth, and also serve to reinforce memory. Our cognitive successes and failure scan also be tracked by passions and trains of passions.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Marguerite La Caze (2002). The Encounter Between Wonder and Generosity. Hypatia 17 (3):1 - 19.
Marguerite La Caze (2002). The Encounter Between Wonder and Generosity. Hypatia 17 (3):1-19.
Stephen Gaukroger (ed.) (1998). The Soft Underbelly of Reason: The Passions in the Seventeenth Century. Routledge.
Anthony Beavers (2000). Passion and Sexual Desire in Descartes. Philosophy and Theology 12 (2):223-243.
Eva T. H. Brann (2008). Feeling Our Feelings: What Philosophers Think and People Know. Paul Dry Books.
Thomas Cook, Adequate Understanding of Inadequate Ideas: Power and Paradox in Spinoza's Cognitive Therapy.
Ron Williston (2003). The Epistemic Problem of Cartesian Passions. International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (3):309-332.
Deborah J. Brown (2006). Descartes and the Passionate Mind. Cambridge University Press.
John Cottingham (2011). Sceptical Detachment or Loving Submission to the Good? Reason, Faith, and the Passions in Descartes. Faith and Philosophy 28 (1):44-53.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads31 ( #44,824 of 722,870 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,870 )
How can I increase my downloads?