Decisions, Decisions: Why Thomas Hunt Morgan Was Not the “Father” of Evo‐Devo

Philosophy of Science 73 (5):918-929 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although the construction of neo-Darwinism grew out of Thomas Hunt Morgan's melding of Darwinism and Mendelism, his evidence did not soley support a model of gradual change. To the contrary, he was confronted with observations that could have led him to a more "evo-devo" understanding of the emergence of novel features. Indeed, since Morgan was an embryologist before he became a fruit-fly geneticist, one would have predicted that the combination of these two lines of research would have resulted in early formulations of concepts relevant to evolutionary developmental biology. It is thus of interest to review Morgan's thought processes and arguments for at first rejecting both Darwinism and Mendelism, and then for later dismissing data that would have yielded a model of rapid morphological change in favor of a model of change based on the accumulation of minor mutations and their morphological consequences.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Evo-devo, devo-evo, and devgen-popgen.Scott F. Gilbert - 2003 - Biology and Philosophy 18 (2):347-352.
Animal cognition meets evo-devo.R. Allen Gardner - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):699-700.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
49 (#286,150)

6 months
2 (#658,848)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?