Graduate studies at Western
British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (6):1067 - 1084 (2011)
|Abstract||According to the standard Aristotelian doctrine of the identity of passion and action (Ipa), a passion and the action with which it is identified are distinguished through a distinction of reason, and both passion and action are located in the patient. Descartes has recently been interpreted by some scholars to be rejecting Ipa in favor of a view that throws into contention a dualistic interpretation of his philosophy of mind. This article contends that Descartes did hold Ipa, albeit expressed in his own metaphysical vocabulary of substance and mode. On this interpretation, (1) a passion and the action with which it is identified are distinguished through a conceptual distinction or distinction of reason and (2) the passion and the action constitute one and the same mode which is locatedin the patient. This result is significant first, because it shows Descartes's retention of a fundamentally Aristotelian understanding of the metaphysical categories of passion and action and second, because it removes some of the support for recent interpretations on which Descartes is seen in the Passions of the Soul to diverge from a dualistic view of mind and body|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Paul Hoffman (2009). Essays on Descartes. Oxford University Press.
Susan James (1997). Passion and Action: The Emotions in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Basileios Kroustallis (2005). Descartes on Passion Reformation. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 87 (3):312-323.
Colin Marshall (2012). Spinoza on Destroying Passions with Reason. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (1):139-160.
Michael Walzer (2002). Passion and Politics. Philosophy and Social Criticism 28 (6):617-633.
Cheryl Hall (2002). 'Passions and Constraint': The Marginalization of Passion in Liberal Political Theory. Philosophy and Social Criticism 28 (6):727-748.
John Cottingham (1999). Susan James, Passion and Action: The Emotions in Seventeenth‐Century Philosophy:Passion and Action: The Emotions in Seventeenth‐Century Philosophy. Ethics 110 (1):205-207.
Bernard Besnier (2003). La conception stoïcienne de la matière. Revue de Métaphysique Et de Morale 1:51-64.
Anthony Beavers (2000). Passion and Sexual Desire in Descartes. Philosophy and Theology 12 (2):223-243.
Clarence Sholé Johnson (1992). Yet Another Look at Cognitive Reason and Moral Action in Hume's Ethical System. Journal of Philosophical Research 17:225-238.
Cheryl Ann Hall (2007). Recognizing the Passion in Deliberation: Toward a More Democratic Theory of Deliberative Democracy. Hypatia 22 (4):81-95.
T. D. J. Chappell (1995). Reason, Passion, and Action: The Third Condition of the Voluntary. Philosophy 70 (273):453 - 459.
Xinyan Jiang (2000). Courage And The Aristotelian Unity Of Action And Passion. Philosophical Inquiry 22 (1-2):23-45.
Martin Lin (2006). Spinoza's Account of Akrasia. Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (3):395-414.
Added to index2011-12-16
Total downloads6 ( #154,793 of 739,318 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,318 )
How can I increase my downloads?