David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (5):521-544 (1997)
De re modality is eliminable if there is an effective translation of all wffs into non-de re equivalents. We cannot have logical equivalence unless 'logic' has odd theses, but we can have material equivalence by banning all essences, something the nonde re facts let us do, or by giving everything such humdrum essences as self-identity and banning the more interesting ones. Eliminability cannot be got from weaker assumptions, nor independent ones of even modest generality. The net philosophical import is that, quite apart from the merits of essentialism, de re language has scant utility
|Keywords||logic language modal de re elimination eliminability Quine essentialism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
W. V. Quine (1953/1980). From a Logical Point of View. Harvard University Press.
G. E. Hughes (1968/1972). An Introduction to Modal Logic. London,Methuen.
Saul A. Kripke (1963). Semantical Considerations on Modal Logic. Acta Philosophica Fennica 16 (1963):83-94.
W. V. Quine (1966). The Ways of Paradox. New York, Random.
Saul A. Kripke (1959). A Completeness Theorem in Modal Logic. Journal of Symbolic Logic 24 (1):1-14.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
J. F. A. K. Benthem (1978). Ramsey Eliminability. Studia Logica 37 (4):321 - 336.
Jay F. Rosenberg (1966). Tensed Discourse and the Eliminability of Tenses. Philosophical Quarterly 16 (63):146-150.
Jonathan Broido (1976). On the Eliminability of de Re Modalities in Some Systems. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 17 (1):79-88.
Adrian-Paul Iliescu (1996). Rational Reconstruction: Preconditions and Limits. Theoria 11 (3):33-47.
Norihiro Kamide (2002). Substructural Logics with Mingle. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 11 (2):227-249.
Thomas Schwartz (1979). Necessary Truth as Analyticity, and the Eliminability of Monadic de Re Formulas. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 20 (2):336-340.
P. Blackburn & B. ten Cate (2006). Pure Extensions, Proof Rules, and Hybrid Axiomatics. Studia Logica 84 (2):277 - 322.
Stephen David Ross (1994). The Limits of Language. Fordham University Press.
Sonia Roca-Royes (2011). Essential Properties and Individual Essences. Philosophy Compass 6 (1):65-77.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #304,000 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #289,836 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?