David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (3):589-599 (2006)
Does a penny viewed at an angle in some sense look elliptical, as though projected on a two-dimensional surface? Many philosophers have said such things, from Malebranche (1674/1997) and Hume (1739/1978), through early 20th-century sense-data theorists, to Tye (2000) and Noë (2004). I confess that it doesn't seem this way to me, though I'm somewhat baffled by the phenomenology and pessimistic about our ability to resolve the dispute. I raise geometrical complaints against the view and conjecture that views of this sort draw some of their appeal from over-analogizing visual experience to painting or photography. Theorists writing in contexts where vision is typically analogized to less-projective media--wax signet impressions in ancient Greece, stereoscopy in introspective psychology circa 1900--are substantially less likely to attribute such projective distortions to visual appearances
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
J. L. Austin (1962). Sense and Sensibilia. Oxford University Press.
Roderick M. Chisholm (1957). Perceiving: A Philosophical Study. Cornell University Press.
David Hume (1739/2000). A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford University Press.
David Hume (1739/1978). Treatise on Human Nature. Oxford University Press.
William James (1890). The Consciousness of Self. In , The Principles of Psychology. Harvard University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Robert Briscoe (2008). Vision, Action, and Make‐Perceive. Mind and Language 23 (4):457-497.
René Jagnow (2012). Representationalism and the Perspectival Character of Perceptual Experience. Philosophical Studies 157 (2):227-249.
Søren Overgaard (2010). On the Looks of Things. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (2):260-284.
Michael Madary (2012). Husserl on Perceptual Constancy. European Journal of Philosophy 20 (1):145-165.
Tom Stoneham (2011). Catching Berkeley's Shadow. Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (2):116-136.
Similar books and articles
David M. Kaplan (2009). Review: What Things Still Don't Do. [REVIEW] Human Studies 32 (2):229 - 240.
Ronald P. Endicott (2011). Flat Versus Dimensioned: The What and the How of Functional Realization. Journal of Philosophical Research 36:191-208.
Arthur D. Grainger (1994). Flat Sets. Journal of Symbolic Logic 59 (3):1012-1021.
Ludomir Newelski (1999). Flat Morley Sequences. Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (3):1261-1279.
Nuel Belnap (2005). Under Carnap's Lamp: Flat Pre-Semantics. Studia Logica 80 (1):1 - 28.
John Gibbons (2010). Things That Make Things Reasonable. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81 (2):335-361.
Murray Alpert & Burt Angrist (2003). The Ketamine Model for Schizophrenia. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (1):82-83.
David M. Kaplan (2009). What Things Still Don't Do. [REVIEW] Human Studies 32 (2):229 - 240.
W. V. Quine (1981). Theories and Things. Harvard University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads19 ( #92,902 of 1,100,137 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #66,996 of 1,100,137 )
How can I increase my downloads?