Ethics and Information Technology 12 (2):127-138 (2010)
|Abstract||The effect of violent video games is among the most widely discussed topics in media studies, and for good reason. These games are immensely popular, but many seem morally objectionable. Critics attack them for a number of reasons ranging from their capacity to teach players weapons skills to their ability to directly cause violent actions. This essay shows that many of these criticisms are misguided. Theoretical and empirical arguments against violent video games often suffer from a number of significant shortcomings that make them ineffective. This essay argues that video games are defensible from the perspective of Kantian, Aristotelian, and utilitarian moral theories.|
|Keywords||Aristotle Computer game Kant Utilitarianism Video game Violence Virtual world|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Aaron Smuts (2003). Film Theory Meets Video Games: An Analysis of the Issues and Methodologies in 'ScreenPlay'. [REVIEW] Film-Philosophy 7 (54).
Mark Coeckelbergh (2007). Violent Computer Games, Empathy, and Cosmopolitanism. Ethics and Information Technology 9 (3):219-231.
Aaron Smuts (2005). Video Games and the Philosophy of Art. American Society for Aesthetics Newsletter.
Monique Wonderly (2008). A Humean Approach to Assessing the Moral Significance of Ultra-Violent Video Games. Ethics and Information Technology 10 (1):1-10.
Matt McCormick (2001). Is It Wrong to Play Violent Video Games? Ethics and Information Technology 3 (4):277–287.
Aaron Smuts (2005). Are Video Games Art? Contemporary Aesthetics 2.
David I. Waddington (2007). Locating the Wrongness in Ultra-Violent Video Games. Ethics and Information Technology 9 (2):121-128.
Added to index2010-03-24
Total downloads191 ( #1,916 of 722,857 )
Recent downloads (6 months)37 ( #2,881 of 722,857 )
How can I increase my downloads?