Engenderings: Constructions of Knowledge, Authority, and Privilege
Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||Naomi Scheman argues that the concerns of philosophy emerge not from the universal human condition but from conditions of privilege. Her books represents a powerful challenge to the notion that gender makes no difference in the construction of philosophical reasoning. At the same time, it criticizes the narrow focus of most feminist theorizing and calls for a more inclusive form of inquiry.|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$1.38 used (97% off) $10.00 new (78% off) $42.70 direct from Amazon (6% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||HQ1190.S34 1993|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Naomi Scheman (1995). Symposium: Feminist Epistemology: Feminist Epistemology. Metaphilosophy 26 (3):177-190.
Keya Maitra (2005). Self-Knowledge: Privileged in Access or Privileged in Authority? Southwest Philosophy Review 21 (2):101-114.
Naomi Scheman (1995). Symposium: Feminist Epistemology: “Feminist Epistemology”: Reply to Antony. Metaphilosophy 26 (3):199-200.
Marian Eide (2008). "The Stigma of Nation": Feminist Just War, Privilege, and Responsibility. Hypatia 23 (2):pp. 48-60.
Lynne Tirrell (1993). Definition and Power: Toward Authority Without Privilege. Hypatia 8 (4):1-34.
Kristina Rolin (2006). The Bias Paradox in Feminist Standpoint Epistemology. Episteme 3 (1-2):125-136.
Naomi Scheman (1993). From Hamlet to Maggie Verver: The History and Politics of the Knowing Subject. In Engenderings: Constructions of Knowledge, Authority and Privilege. Routledge.
Marianne Janack (1997). Standpoint Epistemology Without the 'Standpoint'. Hypatia 12 (2):125-39.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?