Fairness, feelings, and ethical decision- making: Consequences of violating community standards of fairness [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 77 (3):287 - 301 (2008)
In this article, we describe the influence of violations of community standards of fairness (Kahneman, Knetsch, and Thaler, 1986a) on subsequent ethical decision-making and emotions. Across two studies, we manipulated explanations for a common action, and we find that explanations that violate community standards of fairness (e.g., by taking advantage of an in crease in market power) lead to greater intentions to behave unethically than explanations that are consistent with community standards of fairness (e.g., by passing along a price increase). We find that perceptions of justifiability mediate this relationship. We also find that individuals derive significant psychological benefits (greater satisfaction, greater happiness, and reduced anger) from engaging in unethical behavior following perceived violations of fairness.
|Keywords||unethical behavior fairness deception emotions community standards justification|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Theodora Issa & David Pick (2010). Ethical Mindsets: An Australian Study. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 96 (4):613 - 629.
Adam Barsky (2011). Investigating the Effects of Moral Disengagement and Participation on Unethical Work Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 104 (1):59-75.
Jana L. Craft (2013). A Review of the Empirical Ethical Decision-Making Literature: 2004–2011. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 117 (2):221-259.
Majid Ghorbani, Yuan Liao, Sinan Çayköylü & Masud Chand (2013). Guilt, Shame, and Reparative Behavior: The Effect of Psychological Proximity. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 114 (2):311-323.
Adam Nguyen & Juan Meng (2013). Whether and to What Extent Consumers Demand Fair Pricing Behavior for Its Own Sake. Journal of Business Ethics 114 (3):529-547.
Similar books and articles
Ben Saunders (2010). Fairness Between Competing Claims. Res Publica 16 (1):41-55.
Herb Strentz (2002). Universal Ethical Standards? Journal of Mass Media Ethics 17 (4):263 – 276.
Dinah Payne & Frédéric Dimanche (1996). Towards a Code of Conduct for the Tourism Industry: An Ethics Model. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 15 (9):997 - 1007.
Jeremy Snyder (2010). Multiple Forms of Exploitation in International Research: The Need for Multiple Standards of Fairness. American Journal of Bioethics 10 (6):40-41.
Anthony D. Miyazaki (2009). Perceived Ethicality of Insurance Claim Fraud: Do Higher Deductibles Lead to Lower Ethical Standards? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 87 (4):589 - 598.
Brad Hooker (2005). Fairness. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (4):329 - 352.
James L. Schwar (1995). In the Spirit of the Law: An Ethical Alternative to the Fairness Doctrine. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 10 (2):83 – 94.
Angela Ballantyne (2008). 'Fair Benefits' Accounts of Exploitation Require a Normative Principle of Fairness: Response to Gbadegesin and Wendler, and Emanuel Et Al. Bioethics 22 (4):239–244.
Robert Gielissen & Johan Graafland (2009). Concepts of Price Fairness: Empirical Research Into the Dutch Coffee Market. Business Ethics 18 (2):165-178.
Moses L. Pava, Jeremy Pava & Joel Hochman (1999). Fairness as a Constraint in the Real Estate Market. Journal of Business Ethics 19 (1):91 - 97.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #154,226 of 1,102,053 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #91,864 of 1,102,053 )
How can I increase my downloads?