David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Vivarium 46 (1):59-81 (2008)
Interpreters disagree on the origin that Francisco Suárez assigns to political obligation and correlative political subjection. According to some, Suárez, as other social contract theorists, believes that it is the consent of the individuals that causes political obligation. Others, however, claim that for Suárez, political obligation is underived from the individuals' consent which creates the city. In support of this claim they invoke Suárez's view that political power emanates from the city by way of "natural resultancy". I argue that analysis of Suárez's less studied De voto and De iuramento reveals that, for Suárez, consent causes both the city and the citizen's political obligation. Moreover, close inspection of the notion of causation by natural resultancy within Suárez's metaphysics shows that what emanates from the body politic in this fashion is not, as claimed, political subjection and political obligation, but rather the city's right to self-mastership. Because for him political obligation does originate in consent it is not incorrect to regard Suárez as a social contract theorist.
|Keywords||FRANCISCO SUAREZ CONSENT NATURAL RESULTANCY POLITICAL POWER POLITICAL OBLIGATION|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Massimo Renzo (2008). Duties of Samaritanism and Political Obligation. Legal Theory 14 (3):193–217.
Jorge J. E. Gracia (1992). Suárez and the Doctrine of the Transcendentals. Topoi 11 (2):121-133.
George Klosko (2005). Political Obligations. Oup Oxford.
Marleen Rozemond (2012). Unity in the Multiplicity of Suárez's Soul. In Benjamin Hill & Henrik Lagerlund (eds.), The Philosophy of Francisco Suárez. Oup Oxford.
Michael Davis (2012). Locke on Consent: The Two Treatises as Practical Ethics. Philosophical Quarterly 62 (248):464-485.
Andrés Rosler (2005). Political Authority and Obligation in Aristotle. Oxford University Press.
John Petrov Plamenatz (1968). Consent, Freedom and Political Obligation. New York [Etc.]Oxford U.P..
William A. Edmundson (2011). Consent and Its Cousins. Ethics 121 (2):335-53.
Daniel Schwartz (ed.) (2011). Interpreting Suárez: Critical Essays. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads55 ( #36,351 of 1,692,917 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #33,597 of 1,692,917 )
How can I increase my downloads?