David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Oxford University Press (1992)
Some people believe that the demands of morality coincide with the requirements of an enlightened self-interest. Others believe that morality is diametrically opposed to considerations of self-interest. This book argues that there is another position, intermediate between these extremes, which makes better sense of the totality of our moral thought and practice. Scheffler elaborates this position via an examination of morality's content, scope, authority, and deliberative role. Although conflicts between morality and self-interest do arise, according to this position, nevertheless morality is fundamentally a reasonable and humane phenomenon. Moreover, the psychological bases of effective moral motivation have sources deep within the self, and morally motivated individuals try to shape their own interests so as to avoid conflict with morality. Since human practices and institutions help to determine the prevalence of these motives, and since in this and other ways they influence the degree to which conflicts between morality and self-interest actually occur, the extent of such conflict is not fixed or immutable, and is in part a social and political issue.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$0.95 used (98% off) $12.95 new (60% off) $31.95 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||BJ1012.S34 1992|
|ISBN(s)||0195074483 0195085647 9780195085648|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Christine Swanton (2010). Heideggerian Environmental Virtue Ethics. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (1-2):145-166.
Béatrice Longuenesse (2012). Kant's 'I' in 'I Ought To' and Freud's Superego. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 86 (1):19-39.
William Sin (2012). Internalization and Moral Demands. Philosophical Studies 157 (2):163-175.
Pietro Denaro (2012). Moral Harm and Moral Responsibility: A Defence of Ascriptivism. Ratio Juris 25 (2):149-179.
John Haldane (2011). Is Every Action Morally Significant? Philosophy 86 (3):375-404.
Similar books and articles
K. A. Wallace (2009). Common Morality and Moral Reform. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (1):55-68.
Timothy L. Fort (1997). Religion and Business Ethics: The Lessons From Political Morality. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 16 (3):263-273.
Howard Adelman (1991). Morality and Ethics in Organizational Administration. Journal of Business Ethics 10 (9):665 - 678.
Saul Smilansky (2005). The Paradoxical Relationship Between Morality and Moral Worth. Metaphilosophy 36 (4):490-500.
Robert B. Louden (1992). Morality and Moral Theory: A Reappraisal and Reaffirmation. Oxford University Press.
David O. Brink (1994). A Reasonable Morality:Human Morality. Samuel Scheffler. Ethics 104 (3):593-.
Christopher McMahon (2009). Reasonable Disagreement: A Theory of Political Morality. Cambridge University Press.
Ian Maitland (2002). The Human Face of Self-Interest. Journal of Business Ethics 38 (1-2):3 - 17.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads66 ( #32,762 of 1,696,615 )
Recent downloads (6 months)17 ( #32,065 of 1,696,615 )
How can I increase my downloads?