David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy in the Contemporary World 17 (2):37-47 (2010)
I argue that there is an important problem with framing the value of a liberal arts education through a contrast between intrinsic and instrumental value. The paper breaks down into three sections. First, I argue that the traditional divide between intrinsic and instrumental value conflates two pairs of related concepts and that distinguishing those concepts frees us from an important impasse found in contemporary discussions about the liberal arts. Second, I argue that a liberal arts education is only intelligible as a practice if we value it for its own sake. Third, I explain how we can value a liberal arts education as an end even if we reject the possibility of intrinsic value. I conclude with a brief statement of the practical implications my account has for the way we approach the liberal arts
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Miguel Martinez-Saenz & Craig Hanks (2010). The Occlusion of Truth Seeking in a Fog of Marketing. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 17 (2):93-104.
Karen Adkins (2010). Against (Simple) Efficiency. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 17 (2):58-67.
Joseph Poulshock (2011). Practical Critical Realism for Liberal Arts in Language Education. Journal of Critical Realism 10 (4):465-484.
Richard A. Smith & John R. Leach (2010). Liberal Arts Education and Brain Plasticity. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 17 (2):119-130.
Peter J. Mehl (2010). Educating for Life. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 17 (2):105-118.
Nigel Tubbs (2013). The Value of the Arts. Journal of Philosophy of Education 47 (3):441-456.
Charles W. Harvey (2010). The Conservative Limits of Liberal Education. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 17 (2):30-36.
G. B. Kerferd (1954). W. C. Helmbold: Plato's Gorgias, Translated with an Introduction. (The Little Library of Liberal Arts, No. 20.) Pp. X+107. New York: Liberal Arts Press, 1952. Paper, $0.65. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 4 (02):161-.
J. A. Davison (1955). Norman O. Brown: Hesiod's Theogony Translated with an Introduction. (The Library of Liberal Arts, No. 36.) Pp. 88. New York: Liberal Arts Press, 1953. Paper, $0.50. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 5 (02):195-.
Ryan Topping (2012). Happiness and Wisdom: Augustine's Early Theology of Education. Catholic University of America Press.
H. Ll Hudson-Williams (1959). G. M. A. Grube: Longinus, On Great Writing (On the Sublime). Translated with an Introduction. (Library of Liberal Arts, No. 79.) Pp. Xxii + 66. New York: Liberal Arts Press, 1957. Paper, 60 C. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 9 (01):76-.
Daniel R. DeNicola (2012). Learning to Flourish: A Philosophical Exploration of Liberal Education. Continuum.
Charles Tedder (2010). The Liberal Arts and Commensurability. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 17 (2):80-92.
Jeremiah Conway (2010). The Liberal Arts and Contemporary Culture. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 17 (2):4-11.
Nicholas Capaldi (1990). Liberal Values Vs. Liberal Social Philosophy. Philosophy and Theology 4 (3):283-296.
Added to index2012-03-18
Total downloads5 ( #237,418 of 1,101,833 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #128,762 of 1,101,833 )
How can I increase my downloads?