Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy of Science 62 (2):227-40 (1995)
|Abstract||Despite a vast philosophical literature on the epistemology of mathematics and much speculation about how, in principle, knowledge of this domain is possible, little attention has been paid to the psychological findings and theories concerning the acquisition, comprehension and use of mathematical knowledge. This contrasts sharply with recent philosophical work on language where comparable issues and problems arise. One topic that is the center of debate in the study of mathematical cognition is the question of innateness. This paper critically examines the controversy|
|Keywords||Competence Knowledge Mathematics Psychology Science|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jean-Pierre Marquis (1999). Mathematical Engineering and Mathematical Change. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 13 (3):245 – 259.
Evert Willem Beth (1966). Mathematical Epistemology and Psychology. New York, Gordon and Breach.
Stojan Obradović & Slobodan Ninković (2009). The Heuristic Function of Mathematics in Physics and Astronomy. Foundations of Science 14 (4):351-360.
Philip Kitcher (1983). The Nature of Mathematical Knowledge. Oxford University Press.
Helen De Cruz (2007). An Enhanced Argument for Innate Elementary Geometric Knowledge and its Philosophical Implications. In Bart Van Kerkhove (ed.), New perspectives on mathematical practices. Essays in philosophy and history of mathematics. World Scientific.
Helen De Cruz & Johan De Smedt (2010). The Innateness Hypothesis and Mathematical Concepts. Topoi 29 (1):3-13.
Leon Horsten, Philosophy of Mathematics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Mary Leng, Alexander Paseau & Michael D. Potter (eds.) (2007). Mathematical Knowledge. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #86,111 of 740,328 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,960 of 740,328 )
How can I increase my downloads?