Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Click here to configure this browser for off-campus access.
Similar books and articles
No categories
Moral philosophy has long been dominated by the aim of understanding morality and the virtues in terms of principles. However, the underlying assumption that this is the best approach has received almost no defence, and has been attacked by particularists, who argue that the traditional link between morality and principles is little more than an unwarranted prejudice. In Principled Ethics, Michael Ridge and Sean McKeever meet the particularist challenge head-on, and defend a distinctive view they call "generalism as a regulative ideal.".
No categories
This is an early draft of a joint critical notice I am writing of Jonathan Dancy’s Ethics Without Principles and Sean McKeever and Michael Ridge’s Principled Ethics, for Noûs.
Discussion of Mark Schroeder, Jonathan Dancy. Ethics without principles (oxford university press, 2004)sean McKeever and Michael Ridge. Principled ethics (oxford university press, 2006)
|
|
There are no threads in this forum |
Nothing in this forum yet.

