David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Palgrave Macmillan (2012)
Dennis Schulting offers a thoroughgoing, analytic account of the first half of the Transcendental Deduction of the Categories in the B-edition of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason that is different from existing interpretations in at least one important aspect: its central claim is that each of the 12 categories is wholly derivable from the principle of apperception, which goes against the current view that the Deduction is not a proof in a strict philosophical sense and the standard reading that in the Deduction Kant only gives an account of the global applicability of the categories to experience. This novel approach enables a reappraisal of Kant’s controversial claim that transcendental self-consciousness is not only a necessary condition of objective experience but also sufficient for it. The book provides an extensive analysis of Kant’s theory of transcendental apperception and also explains why the argument of the Transcendental Deduction is both a regressive and a progressive argument.
|Keywords||Kant Transcendental Deduction Apperception Categories Critique of Pure Reason|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$64.90 used (24% off) $70.09 new (18% off) $70.80 direct from Amazon (17% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||B2799.A7.S38 2012|
|ISBN(s)||1137256095 9781137256096 9780230358829|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Dennis Schulting (2012). Kant's Deduction and Apperception. Palgrave Macmillan.
Anil Gomes (2010). Is Kant's Transcendental Deduction of the Categories Fit for Purpose? Kantian Review 15 (2):118-137.
Dennis Schulting (2008). Deducing the Categories of Modality and Relation - Reich Revisited. In Valerio Rohden, Riccardo Terra & Guido de Almeida (eds.), Akten des 10. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. de Gruyter. 691--702.
Frederick Rauscher (2012). The Second Step of the B‐Deduction. European Journal of Philosophy 21 (2):n/a-n/a.
Melissa McBay Merritt (2011). Kant's Argument for the Apperception Principle. European Journal of Philosophy 19 (1):59-84.
Robert Hanna (2011). Kant's Non-Conceptualism, Rogue Objects, and The Gap in the B Deduction. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (3):399 - 415.
Henry E. Allison (1993). Apperception and Analyticity in the B-Deduction. Grazer Philosophische Studien 44:233-252.
Ian Proops (2003). Kant's Legal Metaphor and the Nature of a Deduction. Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (2):209-229.
Philip Dwyer (2010). Necessity and Possibility: The Logical Strategy of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (3):402-403.
Hector-Neri Castañeda (1990). The Role of Apperception in Kant's Transcendental Deduction of the Categories. Noûs 24 (1):147-157.
Brandon C. Look (2011). Kant's Thinker. Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (4):502-503.
Nathan Bauer (2010). Kant's Subjective Deduction. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (3):433-460.
Patricia Kitcher (2011). Kant's Thinker. Oxford University Press.
Konstantin Pollok (2008). 'An Almost Single Inference' – Kant's Deduction of the Categories Reconsidered. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 90 (3):323-345.
Added to index2011-05-20
Total downloads30 ( #57,138 of 1,098,999 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #58,097 of 1,098,999 )
How can I increase my downloads?