Kantian rigorism and mitigating circumstances
Ethics 117 (1):32–57 (2006)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesGeoffrey Scarre (2006). Corrective Justice and Reputation. Journal of Moral Philosophy 3 (3):305-319.
Gideon Rosen (2009). Might Kantian Contractualism Be the Supreme Principle of Morality? Ratio 22 (1):78-97.
Evan Tiffany (2006). How Kantian Must Kantian Constructivists Be? Inquiry 49 (6):524 – 546.
Michael Cholbi (2002). Suicide Intervention and Non–Ideal Kantian Theory. Journal of Applied Philosophy 19 (3):245–259.
Christopher W. Gowans (2002). Practical Identities and Autonomy: Korsgaard's Reformation of Kant's Moral Philosophy. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (3):546-570.
John N. Williams (2006). In Defence of an Argument for Evans's Principle: A Rejoinder to Vahid. Analysis 66 (290):167–170.
Douglas Moggach (2006). Republican Rigorism and Emancipation in Bruno Bauer. In Douglas Moggach (ed.), The New Hegelians: Politics and Philosophy in the Hegelian School. Cambridge University Press.
Miodrag S. Lukich & Elmer H. Duncan (1965). Kant's Rigorism: A Problem and A Solution. Southern Journal of Philosophy 3 (4):188-191.
Steven Keith Tudor (2008). Why Should Remorse Be a Mitigating Factor in Sentencing? Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (3):241-257.
Michael Cholbi (2009). The Murderer at the Door: What Kant Should Have Said. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (1):17-46.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads104 ( #5,694 of 549,196 )Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #12,444 of 549,196 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
