David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Critical Review 13 (1-2):31-53 (1999)
Abstract The eighteenth?century controversy among Moses Mendelssohn, Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi, and Immanuel Kant undermines the tendency to equate liberalism with the Enlightenment. While the defender of the Enlightenment, Mendelssohn, championed defended such traditional liberal values as religious toleration, his arguments were often illiberal. In contrast, many of the views of his anti? Establishment opponent, Jacobi, are remarkably liberal. Kant's essays from the mid?i78os advanced a liberal conception of politics but a view of Enlightenment that was quite distant from those of both Mendelssohn and Jacobi.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Onora O'Neill (1989). Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant's Practical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Immanuel Kant, Hugh Barr Nisbet & Hans Reiss (1991). Political Writings. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Frederick Beiser (1987). The Fate of Reason: German Philosophy From Kant to Fichte. Harvard University Press.
Knud Haakonssen (1996). Natural Law and Moral Philosophy: From Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge University Press.
Frederick C. Beiser (1994). Enlightenment, Revolution, and Romanticism: The Genesis of Modern German Political Thought, 1790-1800. Philosophical Review 103 (1):192-194.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Michah Gottlieb (2010). Faith and Freedom: Moses Mendelssohn's Theological-Political Thought. Oxford University Press.
Rainer Baasner (1985). Moses Mendelssohn and the Aesthetics of Enlightenment in the Eighteenth Century. Philosophy and History 18 (1):19-19.
Norman Geras & Robert Wokler (eds.) (1999). The Enlightenment and Modernity. St. Martin's Press.
Robert B. Talisse (2000). Two‐Faced Liberalism: John Gray's Pluralist Politics and the Reinstatement of Enlightenment Liberalism. Critical Review 14 (4):441-458.
B. W. Young (1998). Religion and Enlightenment in Eighteenth-Century England: Theological Debate From Locke to Burke. Clarendon Press.
Daniel Brewer (2008). The Enlightenment Past: Reconstructing Eighteenth-Century French Thought. Cambridge University Press.
Stephen Miller (2001). Three Deaths and Enlightenment Thought: Hume, Johnson, Marat. Associated University Presses.
Julia Simon (2001). Beyond Contractual Morality: Ethics, Law, and Literature in Eighteenth-Century France. University of Rochester Press.
Henry E. Allison (2000). Kant's Conception of Enlightenment. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 7:35-44.
Robert Merrihew Adams (2000). Reading the Silences, Questioning the Terms: A Response to the Focus on Eighteenth-Century Ethics. Journal of Religious Ethics 28 (2):281 - 284.
Graeme Garrard (2006). Counter-Enlightenments: From the Eighteenth-Century to the Present. Routledge.
Jonathan I. Israel (2006). Enlightenment Contested: Philosophy, Modernity, and the Emancipation of Man, 1670-1752. Oxford University Press.
James Schmidt (1992). What Enlightenment Was: How Moses Mendelssohn and Immanuel Kant Answered The. Journal of the History of Philosophy 30 (1).
Added to index2011-10-18
Total downloads16 ( #240,213 of 1,935,081 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #434,530 of 1,935,081 )
How can I increase my downloads?