David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 46 (3):301 – 323 (2003)
This essay examines continuities and transformations in Heidegger's appropriation of Dilthey's account of life and the accompanying picture of history between the end of World War One and Being and Time . The essay also judges the cogency of two conclusions that Heidegger draws in that book about history, viz, that historicity qua feature of Dasein's being both underlies objective history and makes the scholarly narration of history possible. Part one describes Dilthey's account of life, Heidegger's criticism that this account objectifies life, and Heidegger's appropriation of those aspects of Dilthey's account - temporality, movement, and wholes - that do not result from objectification. Part two focuses on how Heidegger reworks the idea that life is movement by reconceptualizing movement as a happening (and not a stream) and by replacing Dilthey's lived experiences with actions. Part three examines how Heidegger takes over from Dilthey the idea that something is historical if and only if the past is part of its present, also attending to the type(s) of past that these thinkers consider to be part of life. A final section judges the cogency of the two aforementioned theses, defending the claim that the historicity of life is the condition of the objective nexus of actions and events called history and criticizing the thesis that the historicity of a historian's life makes the writing of history possible.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Theodore R. Schatzki (2002). The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. Penn State University Press.
Geoffrey Hawthorn (1991). Plausible Worlds: Possibility and Understanding in History and the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press.
J. E. McGuire (2000). Science Unfettered: A Philosophical Study in Sociohistorical Ontology. Ohio University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Theodore R. Schatzki (2006). The Time of Activity. Continental Philosophy Review 39 (2):155-182.
Theodore R. Schatzki (2003). Nature and Technology in History. History and Theory 42 (4):82–93.
Similar books and articles
Daniel O. Dahlstrom (ed.) (2011). Interpreting Heidegger: New Essays. Cambridge University Press.
Martin V. Woessner (2010). Heidegger in America. Cambridge University Press.
Robert C. Scharff (1997). Heidegger's "Appropriation" of Dilthey Before. Journal of the History of Philosophy 35 (1).
Hans Ruin (2013). Thinking Through the Prism of Life. Foundations of Science 18 (2):387-392.
Mark A. Wrathall (2010). Heidegger and Unconcealment: Truth, Language, and History. Cambridge University Press.
A. R. (2003). The Cognition-Knowledge Distinction in Kant and Dilthey and the Implications for Psychology and Self-Understanding. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (1):149-164.
Bob Sandmeyer (2006). Howard N. Tuttle. Human Life is Radical Reality: An Idea Developed From the Conceptions of Dilthey, Heidegger, and Ortega y Gasset. New York: Peter Lang, 2005. Pp. X + 200. Cloth, $59.95. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (1):128-129.
Eric S. Nelson (2011). The World Picture and its Conflict in Dilthey and Heidegger. Humana.Mente 18:19–38.
Theodore R. Schatzki (1993). Wittgenstein + Heidegger on the Stream of Life. Inquiry 36 (3):307 – 328.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads44 ( #77,024 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #289,836 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?