David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Heythrop Journal 53 (5):763-767 (2010)
In his recent writings, Sir Michael Dummett has reflected twice on the Catholic position on the morality of contraception, focusing his attention especially on Humanae Vitae’s prohibition of the contraceptive use of the birth control pill. On examination, Dummett finds this prohibition ‘incoherent’, arguing that its promulgation ‘greatly damaged the respect of the faithful for the Catholic Church’s moral teaching in general’, as well as ‘the integrity of Catholic moral theology’. Given Dummett’s earlier defense of Paul VI’s reaffirmation of the Church’s traditional position on contraception in Humanae Vitae, as well as his forceful criticisms of certain liberalizing tendencies among Catholic theologians and biblical scholars, these arguments deserve to be taken seriously, and regarded as coming from a spirit of serious philosophical reflection rather than casual dissent. Nevertheless, this paper argues that they are based on a misapprehension of what is really behind the position Dummett means to be criticizing, and that when the essentials of that position are clarified the rationale behind it is safe from his objections.
|Keywords||Dummett, Michael contraception sexual ethics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
R. G. Heck (2013). Sir Michael Anthony Eardley Dummett, 1925-2011. Philosophia Mathematica 21 (1):1-8.
Patrick J. Coffey (1988). Humanae Vitae and Licit Contraception? Philosophy and Theology 3 (2):172-182.
Ofra Magidor (2007). Strict Finitism Refuted? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 107 (1pt3):403-411.
Michael Dummett (2006). Thought and Reality. Oxford University Press.
Jacqueline A. Laing (2012). The Background and Consequences of the Reproductive Revolution. Catholic Medical Quarterly 62:24-37.
Jan Dejnožka (2010). Dummett's Forward Road to Frege and to Intuitionism. Diametros 25:118-131.
J. Edwards (2003). Michael Dummett. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (2):298-300.
John P. Burgess (1984). Dummett's Case for Intuitionism. History and Philosophy of Logic 5 (2):177-194.
Michael Dummett (2005). Hume's Atomism About Events: A Response to Ulrich Meyer. Philosophy 80 (1):141-144.
Michael Dummett (1988). Reply to `Dummett's Dig', by Baker and Hacker. Philosophical Quarterly 38 (150):87-103.
Benjamin Murphy, Michael Dummett. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Gregory Currie (1983). I. Interpreting Frege: A Reply to Michael Dummett. Inquiry 26 (3):345 – 359.
Jon Cogburn (2005). The Logic of Logical Revision Formalizing Dummett's Argument. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83 (1):15 – 32.
Alexander Miller (2003). The Significance of Semantic Realism. Synthese 136 (2):191 - 217.
Added to index2010-11-25
Total downloads59 ( #28,671 of 1,102,070 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #91,808 of 1,102,070 )
How can I increase my downloads?